linux-phy.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Rework init to drop redundant zero-out loop
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 12:44:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <158df3b2-a7fa-449d-9cc8-1e4cdf6ef49b@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240105-phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater-fixes-v2-2-775d98e7df05@linaro.org>

On 5.01.2024 11:16, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The device match config init table already has zero values, so rework
> the container struct to hold a copy of the init table that can be
> override be the DT specified values. By doing this, only the number of
> vregs remain in the device match config that will be later needed, so
> instead of holding the cfg after probe, store the number of vregs in the
> container struct.
> 
> Fixes: 99a517a582fc ("phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater: Zero out untouched tuning regs")
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> ---

This looks good as-is, though I think my proposal of storing the
peripheral base reg instead is still better, as it'd require less
memory (no kmemdup as the regs wouldn't be modified).

Konrad

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-05 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-05 10:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Some fixes after the regmap rework Abel Vesa
2024-01-05 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Fix the regfields for multiple instances Abel Vesa
2024-01-05 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Rework init to drop redundant zero-out loop Abel Vesa
2024-01-05 11:44   ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2024-01-05 12:22     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-01-08 10:29       ` Abel Vesa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=158df3b2-a7fa-449d-9cc8-1e4cdf6ef49b@linaro.org \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).