From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B457EC6FA90 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:06:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=JSoZp6j7hj25MgjjlCKGuhtekwouBt7iPD/Kx4cYD9s=; b=Kou68GcFWuHWmV GZCwV9lUkpBjkq3B6Y5U1VBMT09myFuOJE1NYVJlQzn4baZocI4xOFFe7OseJYZ/7PSTVokguXuVJ LG0h4gKTJ5yDax7Iyx5OkPMw32mrwJVVjCZD7n7UUr7fGy4yeQSA4J/c3fYnvUCWUp4nJ3SUoKizl CSQjBY0pJft6kHQo8sAPTCzXM4oCn40fnjTRgDTZuxlCqcX3wuZT62veBZf8Mt1jX7sjjyVSNhVf2 F/MiWawNkLRs+5iBzpL4Yn5RabxioBAkzj661ObNqk7yo/oQ9ix9B8G5uXQq4/q1GEK3Y1NU8flPi wfF8Zodw8SHPfhheh2Ew==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1obAfu-00D2rA-Tb; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:06:46 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1obAfr-00D2q9-LZ for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:06:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30ADF63341; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5789C433C1; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:06:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1663808802; bh=Lqql20nTSnQlo3UFTHU7a3vI+xkva1fKFe3nZS5Lp4g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gPiukSsEugg8Lc4O5ByTkiYnYX0Qhdwg7dw2bwdf6wdRfIFOqi/yU0eOyW/JUi0a3 Rm7fIuhXfrXOeyjiUhOAq4Dk96KHtuLw7UHp5OM8AYzINZHpe6ZKXcfbtUkt2rIzRd yzt4u2mu8MFg9bfEP2+9whv+iZWOaTS6+gZJGUlTL+kTP9c43PXH9KfzT6OqihKX2+ eQvAn4kJ2dCFOA2owCeuA9Y5yFcib6qF0Zsrigp9j8hM5OWZr1rbGlwujpaNdcHGYV XH0AQeB7yPL+WQgyjHcKwO+ginr0XknOn+U+LAkG+zdTfbfVK8c4BO/zejrb14f839 QW5LEfavE2SaA== Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:06:40 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yoshihiro Shimoda Cc: "kishon@ti.com" , "vkoul@kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "richardcochran@gmail.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" , "geert+renesas@glider.be" , "andrew@lunn.ch" , "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] treewide: Add R-Car S4-8 Ethernet Switch support Message-ID: <20220921180640.696efb1a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220921084745.3355107-1-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> <20220921074004.43a933fe@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220921_180643_770384_B150687A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:46:34 +0000 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide: > 1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or > change multiple subsystems in a patch. > 2) Convenient for review. > > This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use > treewide for the 1) only? I thought "treewide" means you're changing something across the tree. If you want to get a new platform reviewed I'd just post the patches as RFC without any prefix in the subject. But I could be wrong. My main point (which I did a pretty poor job of actually making) was that for the networking driver to be merged it needs to get posted separately. -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy