On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:28:05PM -0400, Rudraksha Gupta wrote:
> On Mon May 29, 2023 at 3:41 AM EDT, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

> > Please fix your email client:
> >
> > - wrap each line at about 80 characters
> > - don't trim messages unless they're very long or
> >   there's some other good reason
> > - Don't send v(n+1) as a reply to v(n), send it in a
> >   separate thread.
> >
> Gotcha, I will do that next time. Should I still send v2 in a separate
> thread?

That'd then be either [PATCH v3], or [RESEND PATCH v2]. Ideally v3 since
you will have added the tags you received on v2.
AFAIK Bjorn uses b4, which should be able to deal with the series as-is,
but sending a v3 with the Acks etc would not be a bad idea. You
should probably give it a couple days before doing that to see if it
gets picked up before doing that.

> Not sure if I should as I don't want to spam anyone.

Sending new revisions of patches as a new thread is not spamming, we
signed up to be maintainers, or get to email from the lists, after all.
Sending several revisions of the same patches in a day would be spamming
though, but that is not what we are talking about here ;)

Cheers,
Conor.