From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org (open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated
list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support),
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC
support), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use guard notation when acquiring mutex
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:49:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012071919.3726-7-linux.amoon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012071919.3726-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Using guard notation makes the code more compact and error handling
more robust by ensuring that mutexes are released in all code paths
when control leaves critical section.
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
---
v3: New patch
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 6dd014625226..bd44af36c67a 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
int err = 0;
- mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
if (--rk_phy->pwr_cnt) {
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -146,11 +145,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -161,10 +158,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
int err = 0;
u32 status;
- mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
if (rk_phy->pwr_cnt++) {
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -172,7 +168,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
if (err) {
dev_err(&phy->dev, "deassert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
rk_phy->pwr_cnt--;
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -230,13 +225,11 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
goto err_pll_lock;
}
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
err_pll_lock:
reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
rk_phy->pwr_cnt--;
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -246,10 +239,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
int err = 0;
- mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) {
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -257,11 +249,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
if (err) {
dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
rk_phy->init_cnt--;
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -270,13 +260,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
- mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
if (--rk_phy->init_cnt)
goto err_init_cnt;
err_init_cnt:
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
}
--
2.44.0
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-12 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 7:19 [PATCH v3 0/6] RK3399: PCie Phy using new helper function Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Simplify error handling with dev_err_probe() Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout() for PCIe reference clk PLL status Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Refactor mutex handling in rockchip_pcie_phy_power_off() Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Refactor mutex handling in rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on() Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon [this message]
2024-12-02 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] RK3399: PCie Phy using new helper function Anand Moon
2024-12-08 17:02 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241012071919.3726-7-linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--to=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).