From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92C43E77171 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:05:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=PfEvQMntWMJg0nnKOkUuQxijKlkNztDBwkPkWTM9EtU=; b=oSzqnZpDU9S3Ce VWplvJ5AjBQMuJnYg3pR9H6EGsQdjMj44yaaVFcATTyYDWadQy9NoLEQJZd/UDA/4UB2sJ05UJ+ot toDMJ5veY9hyydRJIKo7vhi4EYyPvHnGN9QgsqmSpcuCsqadpkjJp7tywD2WmY9IFKZ6SHmCp9CcJ a5vj2djzAtxQpHOYGulsgmhk/6+Mw/ihpX880KJX8fIH5gCp/16q3SYE5NBHPEnxb/5ndXSLotHK8 zRuboyfbqCS3zO9hrTrGK038kdylm5d5/uKlZr9TF/pP4Ohe5GrL3VBaW7nedUv4KehJFM/zpylPN nMvb8N/3foaYLn9zMWAg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tJ6rH-0000000F7EJ-2q8E; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:05:11 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tJ6qF-0000000F724-4BYc; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:04:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D560A42A97; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F234C4CED6; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:04:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1733385846; bh=FIozSi8SgpqkY9ZdwR7YpI65MxDaseGvlnzWbKVg2nk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cCM/WL7AcmSti272C/8pmCDv4/kLRfmjlVaxX6jKtkohw9FU+pWVbFqN4btG9sx1u XLqWNZjvXB3yI3t6NUvjR32zdTUc0z9+CF/hZQ58QjaxQ/+2VfMyW6NYoqvAb1t2L6 67Q9FWFCiKGW3ZiwO2xNke6z1SrKKCgiK/Rdd9t0= Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 09:04:02 +0100 From: Greg KH To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik Cc: Vinod Koul , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Marek Szyprowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Alim Akhtar , Peter Griffin , Tudor Ambarus , Sam Protsenko , Will McVicker , Roy Luo , kernel-team@android.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: gs101: ensure power is gated to SS phy in phy_exit() Message-ID: <2024120528-poker-thinness-6cfb@gregkh> References: <20241205-gs101-phy-lanes-orientation-phy-v3-0-32f721bed219@linaro.org> <20241205-gs101-phy-lanes-orientation-phy-v3-5-32f721bed219@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241205-gs101-phy-lanes-orientation-phy-v3-5-32f721bed219@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241205_000408_113222_BBFC6A3A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.20 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 07:33:16AM +0000, Andr=E9 Draszik wrote: > We currently don't gate the power to the SS phy in phy_exit(). > = > Shuffle the code slightly to ensure the power is gated to the SS phy as > well. > = > Fixes: 32267c29bc7d ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support Exynos USBDRD 3.1 comb= o phy (HS & SS)") > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11+ Why is a patch 5/8 a stable thing? If this is such an important bugfix, it should be sent separately as a 1/1 patch, right? thanks, greg k-h -- = linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy