From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139EEC87FCE for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:08:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Q67woZS28rJRFPR2qw9wVxz65iCvgE4zOF57gLSyRWA=; b=Rqk1mvPoGfueYr rdF5Fy6uLL4J/bwsL2Hpn959ml++PvbcCFJjNE9CS7vhrXC2HWYjISTSt2+Zgpr/eBLj3zqEyyvhF z0dIYEcLiNJ6WMgH4HXY5mNnfKcXOb4PORtKPuVih6dvUWwambNtQKfe05h0y2K3kKtte7PXeTiHz DxFJMC1sd6eXhXukyGMJd+hscGUcL2tZWRvio3xiWUupAnVFKTnLP3lVMESo1MZ126tEqWN8RWiMD DAiXjcNlKsZpwjVp39A45abwL2NHX4FEMokYtpo0JhOKkwRxDX0z79ePcAX13DGSizEE8k4HFwNHw /EfoeN79g0cAhXRkzDHQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ufRX2-0000000ApaJ-2gy2; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:08:52 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ufRSH-0000000ApC3-3Beg; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:03:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218BD601DC; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92499C4CEE7; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:03:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753484636; bh=/ihqXbiLnvze8X7uQMIFreBNaBY/ADD8BZyIiZGUufc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FEXjstUOI0TN9HQBSTBwqbatkXGLTR8j38MRH0gaYGIjujVkhVpmcdbrufiYTszqh ixhIl1p7DSDHg+eXdv19MOviwgiL6yDT3Sdfr9UvFsaDUwIURonuKLJ4buX0FqURKj vJDuCcW94BuqQ2EeIuKROn1vn3TyYKszJkmmbyqApPir9CHfxOO/XqucVDJnSRazip 9Nzcwxa+Yf3rEBR3wHIxoOYkXz4bnce80LHQaI7vkxojkbhp7CKUyO+pus/y705TKF uWbYGINWxygVgHZH6wPF4H5nP+zOhZzq5vqqSUqJ/HLOI3kS82hUx6KZ4mpYuuo0zO N/mMYbJxHCwtw== Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:03:55 -0500 From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" To: Jonas Karlman Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Yao Zi , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul , Chukun Pan Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: Require GRF for RK3568/RV1108 Message-ID: <20250725230355.GB1993803-robh@kernel.org> References: <20250723122323.2344916-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> <20250723122323.2344916-2-jonas@kwiboo.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250723122323.2344916-2-jonas@kwiboo.se> X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 12:22:59 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > Typically these Rockchip USB2 PHYs are fully contained within a single > GRF. However, for RK3568 and RV1108 regs to control the USB2 PHY is > located in a different GRF compared to the base address. > > Update this binding to require rockchip,usbgrf for RK3568 and RV1108 to > properly reflect that the USB GRF is required to control the USB2 PHYs > on these variants. Also disable use of rockchip,usbgrf for variants > where it is not required. > > This should not introduce any breakage as the affected usb2phy nodes for > RK3568 and RV1108 were added together with a rockchip,usbgrf phandle in > their initial commit. > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman > --- > .../bindings/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy