Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: fix disconnection in gadget mode

From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"William Wu" <wulf@rock-chips.com>,
	"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	"Minas Harutyunyan" <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
	"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Louis Chauvet" <louis.chauvet@bootlin.com>,
	"Hervé Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: fix disconnection in gadget mode
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 13:20:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025112725-enviably-ground-9342@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DEJEFLKA9IJR.237ZLV8HBD2VS@bootlin.com>

On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 11:18:45AM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hi Théo,
> 
> On Thu Nov 27, 2025 at 10:48 AM CET, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > On Thu Nov 27, 2025 at 10:22 AM CET, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> >> On Tue Nov 25, 2025 at 4:28 PM CET, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> >>>> The code already checks for !rport->suspended, so add a guard for VBUS as
> >>>> well to avoid a disconnection when a cable is connected.
> >>>
> >>> Your commit message was clear but I was missing one key point: what
> >>> rport->suspended means. It isn't what I first thought. Instead it means
> >>> phy is powered off. Naming is bad but unrelated to your series. Maybe
> >>> add a comment to your commit message like the following?
> >>>
> >>>   The code already checks for !rport->suspended (PHY is powered on), ...
> >>
> >> You are right. I have added a slightly longer text:
> >>
> >>   The code already checks for !rport->suspended (which, somewhat
> >>   counter-intuitively, means the PHY is powered on), ...
> >>
> >> Still worth your Reviewed-by?
> >
> > Even more so.
> 
> Thanks, v2 on its way.
> 
> >> I also added the Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org line, which I noticed being
> >> missing.
> >
> > I never add that Cc trailer and only rely on `Fixes:`. I thought it
> > used to be documented as an alternative to that Cc trailer but it does
> > not show up in `git log -p Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst`
> >
> > There is one indirect mention of "scripts that look for commits
> > containing a 'Fixes:' tag":
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.9/source/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst#L132-L134
> >
> > Anyway, you do right by explicitly tagging `Cc: stable@...`.
> 
> Theory says Cc: is needed:
> 
> > Note: Attaching a Fixes: tag does not subvert the stable kernel rules
> > process nor the requirement to Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org on all stable
> > patch candidates.
> (https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight)
> 
> But in the practice I happened to forget Cc: stable in the past, the patch
> got applied and the Fixes: tag was enough for correct cherry-pick in stable
> branches.

That is never guaranteed, it is a "best effort only when the stable
maintainers are bored" type of thing.  Always be explicit, and use cc:
stable, as the documentation has stated for the last 17+ years :)

thanks,

greg k-h

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy