From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Convert to use device property API
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 18:26:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260224162606.spnzzedvmvp2h7xd@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219202910.2304440-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20260219202910.2304440-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 09:26:19PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It seems the driver is half-moved to use device property APIs.
> Finish that by converting everything to use that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> index 330356706ad7..f2259af4af8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2021 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com
> *
> */
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, can_transceiver_phy_ids);
> static inline struct mux_state *
> devm_mux_state_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
> {
> - if (!of_property_present(dev->of_node, "mux-states"))
> + if (!device_property_present(dev, "mux-states"))
There's an entire saga with this function - devm_mux_state_get_optional().
Josua Mayer is preparing to move it to the MUX core, which will be a cross-tree series.
Would you mind not touching this, to avoid complicating what is already
a complicated operation? It is going away anyway, and from what I can
see in Josua's last series, its implementation from drivers/mux/core.c
is already using device property APIs:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20260208-rz-sdio-mux-v9-2-9a3be13c1280@solid-run.com/
> return NULL;
>
> return devm_mux_state_get(dev, mux_name);
> @@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct can_transceiver_phy *can_transceiver_phy;
> struct can_transceiver_priv *priv;
> const struct can_transceiver_data *drvdata;
> - const struct of_device_id *match;
> struct phy *phy;
> struct gpio_desc *silent_gpio;
> struct gpio_desc *standby_gpio;
> @@ -171,8 +170,7 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> u32 max_bitrate = 0;
> int err, i, num_ch = 1;
>
> - match = of_match_node(can_transceiver_phy_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
> - drvdata = match->data;
> + drvdata = device_get_match_data(dev);
> if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_DUAL_CH)
> num_ch = 2;
>
> @@ -197,7 +195,7 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> can_transceiver_phy = &priv->can_transceiver_phy[i];
> can_transceiver_phy->priv = priv;
>
> - phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, &can_transceiver_phy_ops);
> + phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &can_transceiver_phy_ops);
It is not obvious why you replaced dev->of_node with NULL here.
It doesn't appear correct. You seem to be breaking OF-based PHY lookups.
> if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to create can transceiver phy\n");
> return PTR_ERR(phy);
> --
> 2.50.1
>
>
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 20:26 [PATCH v1 0/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Ad-hoc cleanups and refactoring Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-19 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Convert to use device property API Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-24 16:26 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2026-02-24 16:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-24 18:30 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-02-28 11:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-17 10:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-17 20:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-19 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Move OF ID table closer to their user Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-19 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Don't check for specific errors when parsing properties Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-19 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Drop unused include Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260224162606.spnzzedvmvp2h7xd@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=josua@solid-run.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox