From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 14:53:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522145338.A0CA51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522-x1e-csi2-phy-v7-1-79cb1280fad6@linaro.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The device tree example fails schema validation because `port@2`'s endpoint includes `data-lanes` and `clock-lanes` which are forbidden by the schema.
--
commit f15340b905d3f2f95e02027798a2eb5d4ed06bf5
Author: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema
This commit adds a new base schema for the x1e80100 MIPI CSI2 PHY devices.
It supports CPHY, DPHY, and DPHY split-mode by modeling the CSIPHY devices
as individual nodes with three distinct ports.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f434fb04447f6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
[ ... ]
> + port@2:
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> + description: Output to CAMSS controller.
> +
> + properties:
> + endpoint:
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/endpoint-base
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + properties:
> + remote-endpoint: true
> + required:
> + - remote-endpoint
[ ... ]
> +examples:
> + - |
[ ... ]
> + port@2 {
> + reg = <2>;
> + csiphy0_out_ep: endpoint {
> + data-lanes = <3>;
> + clock-lanes = <4>;
[Severity: Low]
Will this example fail dt_binding_check schema validation?
The schema definition above for port@2's endpoint points to endpoint-base and
sets unevaluatedProperties to false, without locally defining data-lanes or
clock-lanes.
However, the example uses them here. Does the port@2 definition need a
reference to video-interfaces.yaml like the other ports, or should these
properties be removed from the example?
> + remote-endpoint = <&controller_in>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260522-x1e-csi2-phy-v7-0-79cb1280fad6@linaro.org?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 14:45 [PATCH v7 0/2] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Add a CSI2 MIPI DPHY driver Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-05-22 14:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-05-22 14:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-22 16:49 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-05-22 21:37 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-05-22 14:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Add a CSI2 MIPI DPHY driver Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-05-22 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522145338.A0CA51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox