From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 phy-next 14/16] dt-bindings: phy: lynx-10g: initial document
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:33:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603133350.9FA271F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603132059.503527-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `if` condition for enforcing the `big-endian` property incorrectly matches the `compatible` string array directly against an `enum`, which will always evaluate to false and cause the requirement to silently fail.
--
commit 8bd3982a89722b20a3686e42d4ab3b9f0711ae11
Author: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
dt-bindings: phy: lynx-10g: initial document
This commit adds the schema for the 10G Lynx SerDes used on most QorIQ and
Layerscape SoCs. It defines the valid compatible strings, PHY cell requirements,
and enforces SoC-specific constraints such as lane counts and endianness.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..8cf6027a75b91
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-10g.yaml
[ ... ]
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - fsl,ls1028a-serdes
> + - fsl,ls1046a-serdes1
> + - fsl,ls1046a-serdes2
> + - fsl,ls1088a-serdes1
> + - fsl,ls1088a-serdes2
> + then:
> + patternProperties:
> + "^phy@[0-7]$":
> + properties:
> + reg:
> + minimum: 0
> + maximum: 3
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - fsl,ls1046a-serdes1
> + - fsl,ls1046a-serdes2
[Severity: Medium]
Does this conditional correctly enforce the big-endian property?
Since the compatible property is a string array in device trees, evaluating it
directly against an enum always returns false. Should this use "contains:"
with the enum, similar to the preceding if block, so dt_binding_check
correctly enforces the requirement?
> + then:
> + required:
> + - big-endian
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603131914.503053-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com?part=14
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 13:18 [PATCH v3 phy-next 00/16] New Generic PHY driver for Lynx 10G SerDes Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 01/16] phy: lynx-28g: avoid returning NULL in of_xlate() function Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 02/16] phy: lynx-28g: reject probing on devices with unsupported OF nodes Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 03/16] phy: lynx-28g: move lane mode helpers to new core module Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 04/16] phy: lynx-28g: move data structures to core Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 05/16] phy: lynx-28g: common lynx_pll_get() Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 06/16] phy: lynx-28g: generalize protocol converter accessors Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 07/16] phy: lynx-28g: provide default lynx_lane_supports_mode() implementation Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 08/16] phy: lynx-28g: move struct lynx_info definitions downwards Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 09/16] phy: lynx-28g: make lynx_28g_pll_read_configuration() callable per PLL Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 10/16] phy: lynx-28g: common probe() and remove() Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 11/16] phy: lynx-28g: add support for big endian register maps Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 12/16] phy: lynx-28g: optimize read-modify-write operation Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:20 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 13/16] phy: lynx-28g: improve phy_validate() procedure Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 14/16] dt-bindings: phy: lynx-10g: initial document Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-03 13:38 ` Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 15:50 ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-03 13:21 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 15/16] phy: lynx-10g: new driver Vladimir Oltean
2026-06-03 13:21 ` [PATCH v3 phy-next 16/16] MAINTAINERS: expand Lynx 28G entry to cover Lynx 10G SerDes Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603133350.9FA271F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox