From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: apple: atc: remove stale kernel-doc for removed struct members
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 05:44:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608054449.874271F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608053525.12354-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] The patch removes kernel-doc descriptions for `@sw` and `@mux`, falsely claiming the struct members were removed, which introduces new kernel-doc warnings.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Type-C switch and mux objects are leaked and cause Use-After-Free on driver unbind or probe error.
--
commit 2c0f305efb460c36ad63bcaef90a04f555e5a65b
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
phy: apple: atc: remove stale kernel-doc for removed struct members
The @sw and @mux members were removed from struct apple_atcphy but their
kernel-doc entries remained, causing kernel-doc warnings.
> The @sw and @mux members were removed from struct apple_atcphy but their
> kernel-doc entries remained, causing kernel-doc warnings.
[Severity: Low]
Are these members actually removed? The struct definition still contains
both sw and mux. Removing their kernel-doc comments while the members remain
will introduce new warnings about missing descriptions rather than fixing them.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/apple/atc.c b/drivers/phy/apple/atc.c
> index e9d106f135c51..37be29d855cd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/apple/atc.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/apple/atc.c
> @@ -585,8 +585,6 @@ struct atcphy_mode_configuration {
> * @phys.dp: DisplayPort PHY instance
> * @phy_provider: PHY provider instance
> * @rcdev: Reset controller device
> - * @sw: Type-C switch instance
> - * @mux: Type-C mux instance
> * @lock: Mutex for synchronizing register access across PHY, Type-C switch/mux and reset controller
> */
> struct apple_atcphy {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do we leak the Type-C switch and mux objects
on probe error or driver unbind?
Looking at atcphy_probe_switch() and atcphy_probe_mux(), they register the
devices but discard the pointers:
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(typec_switch_register(atcphy->dev, &sw_desc));
Since these aren't devres-managed, the pointers must be saved to properly call
typec_switch_unregister() and typec_mux_unregister() on teardown.
If the driver is unbound or probe fails later, the devres-managed atcphy context
is freed. The registered switch and mux still retain a pointer to this freed
memory in their drvdata. Later calls like atcphy_mux_set() will dereference it:
struct apple_atcphy *atcphy = typec_mux_get_drvdata(mux);
guard(mutex)(&atcphy->lock);
Could this result in a use-after-free?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608053525.12354-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 5:35 [PATCH] phy: apple: atc: remove stale kernel-doc for removed struct members Rosen Penev
2026-06-08 5:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608054449.874271F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox