From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Do not lose USB3 PHY status
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:38:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612163835.8D5471F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612-rockchip-usbdp-cleanup-v5-2-efc83069869f@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] State desynchronization on `rk_udphy_init` failure causes subsequent power-on retries to falsely return success without re-initializing the hardware, leading to dead PHY or bus hangs.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Subsystem power-off requests permanently leak `udphy->status` bits if the Type-C mode has physically changed, causing a perpetual resource leak of the PHY clocks.
--
commit 93e296ece1bf03449fcdb7d0485cb77da80dd9b7
Author: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
phy: rockchip: usbdp: Do not lose USB3 PHY status
This commit fixes an issue where the USB3 tracking information is lost
when the DisplayPort is re-initialized. It does this by preventing the
status variable from being cleared during mode changes in the PHY driver.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-usbdp.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-usbdp.c
> index fba35510d88ce..744cc7c642f49 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-usbdp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-usbdp.c
> @@ -1009,7 +1009,6 @@ static int rk_udphy_power_on(struct rk_udphy *udphy, u8 mode)
> rk_udphy_u3_port_disable(udphy, false);
> } else if (udphy->mode_change) {
> udphy->mode_change = false;
> - udphy->status = UDPHY_MODE_NONE;
[Severity: High]
If rk_udphy_init() fails (for example, returning -EPROBE_DEFER after a lock
timeout), will this lead to a permanent state desynchronization?
By removing the clearing of udphy->status, if the initialization fails,
udphy->mode_change is already set to false but udphy->status remains
non-zero.
If the subsystem later retries rk_udphy_power_on(), it will see
udphy->status != UDPHY_MODE_NONE and udphy->mode_change == false. Could
this cause it to bypass all initialization, blindly update the status, and
falsely return success while the PHY hardware remains disabled and in reset?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but removing the forced clearing of
udphy->status here exposes a potential permanent resource leak of the PHY
clocks.
Looking at rk_udphy_power_off():
if (!(udphy->mode & mode)) {
dev_info(udphy->dev, "mode 0x%02x is not support\n", mode);
return;
}
and rk_udphy_usb3_phy_exit():
if (!(udphy->mode & UDPHY_MODE_USB) || udphy->hs)
return 0;
If the Type-C multiplexer switches from DP_USB to a DP_ONLY mode,
udphy->mode loses the USB bit. If the USB controller then unbinds and calls
phy_exit() while in DP_ONLY mode, the early returns above prevent clearing
the UDPHY_MODE_USB bit from udphy->status.
When DP eventually powers off, will udphy->status remain non-zero due to
this orphaned USB bit, preventing rk_udphy_disable() from ever executing
and leaking the PHY clocks and power?
> if (udphy->mode == UDPHY_MODE_DP)
> rk_udphy_u3_port_disable(udphy, true);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612-rockchip-usbdp-cleanup-v5-0-efc83069869f@collabora.com?part=2
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 16:21 [PATCH v5 00/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Fixes, DP 1-lane support and cleanups Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-usbdp: add improved ports scheme Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Do not lose USB3 PHY status Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Keep clocks running on PHY re-init Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Amend SSC modulation deviation Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Fix LFPS detect threshold control Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Add missing mode_change update Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Support single-lane DP Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Rename DP lane functions Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Use FIELD_PREP_WM16_CONST Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Cleanup DP lane selection function Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Register DP aux bridge Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Drop DP HPD handling Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Rename mode_change to phy_needs_reinit Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Re-init the PHY on orientation change Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 17:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Factor out lane_mux_sel setup Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Use guard functions for mutex Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Support going from DP-only mode to USB mode Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 17:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] phy: rockchip: usbdp: Add some extra debug messages Sebastian Reichel
2026-06-12 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612163835.8D5471F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox