Linux-PHY Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Petr Wozniak" <petr.wozniak@gmail.com>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: phy: sfp: free mii_bus in sfp_i2c_mdiobus_destroy
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:05:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624080551.0F3C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623080538.7646-2-petr.wozniak@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The delayed works (`sfp->poll` and `sfp->timeout`) can execute after their dependent GPIO descriptors and IRQs are released, leading to Use-After-Free.
--

commit 318c6861220a57086d547ce894cf1c029a4d3639
Author: Petr Wozniak <petr.wozniak@gmail.com>

net: phy: sfp: free mii_bus in sfp_i2c_mdiobus_destroy

sfp_i2c_mdiobus_create() allocates the I2C MDIO bus with mdio_i2c_alloc(),
a plain (non-devm) allocation, and registers it. sfp_i2c_mdiobus_destroy()
only unregisters the bus and clears sfp->i2c_mii without calling
mdiobus_free(). As the only reference to the bus is then cleared, the
struct mii_bus is leaked.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> index 03bfd8640db96..c4d274ab651e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> @@ -963,6 +963,7 @@ static int sfp_i2c_mdiobus_create(struct sfp *sfp)
>  static void sfp_i2c_mdiobus_destroy(struct sfp *sfp)
>  {
>  	mdiobus_unregister(sfp->i2c_mii);
> +	mdiobus_free(sfp->i2c_mii);
>  	sfp->i2c_mii = NULL;
>  }

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing the teardown
path I noticed a potential use-after-free during device unbind or module
removal.

In sfp_probe(), sfp_cleanup() is registered before allocating the GPIO
descriptors:

drivers/net/phy/sfp.c:sfp_probe() {
    ...
	err = devm_add_action_or_reset(sfp->dev, sfp_cleanup, sfp);
	if (err < 0)
		return err;
    ...
	for (i = 0; i < GPIO_MAX; i++)
		if (sff->gpios & BIT(i)) {
			sfp->gpio[i] = devm_gpiod_get_optional(sfp->dev,
					   gpio_names[i], gpio_flags[i]);
    ...
}

During unbind, devres runs cleanup actions in reverse LIFO order, meaning
the GPIO descriptors are freed first.

sfp_remove() doesn't cancel sfp->poll. If sfp->need_poll is true, the poll
worker could fire and access the freed GPIO descriptors before sfp_cleanup()
finally cancels it:

drivers/net/phy/sfp.c:sfp_cleanup() {
    ...
	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sfp->poll);
	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sfp->timeout);
    ...
}

Could this lead to a panic when unbinding the device or removing the module?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623080538.7646-1-petr.wozniak@gmail.com?part=1

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23  8:05 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: phy: sfp/mdio-i2c: defer RollBall probe + fix mii_bus leak Petr Wozniak
2026-06-23  8:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: phy: sfp: free mii_bus in sfp_i2c_mdiobus_destroy Petr Wozniak
2026-06-23 16:23   ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-24  8:05   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23  8:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: phy: mdio-i2c: defer RollBall bridge probe to PHY discovery Petr Wozniak
2026-06-23 16:28   ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-24  8:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: phy: sfp/mdio-i2c: defer RollBall probe + fix mii_bus leak Maxime Chevallier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260624080551.0F3C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=petr.wozniak@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox