From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gokul Praveen" <g-praveen@ti.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
olteanv@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Add PLL1 refclk to J784S4 SoC SERDES node
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:53:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630135354.4D7F01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630134324.61085-2-g-praveen@ti.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] Adding a third clock to the 'serdes2' node violates the 'phy-cadence-torrent.yaml' DT binding. The subsequent binding update in the series is logically incomplete and fails to resolve the validation error.
- [Low] Missing whitespace after the comma in the 'clock-names' list.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the commit fails to comprehensively fix the issue. It adds 'pll1_refclk' to fix multilink configuration for 'serdes2', but ignores identical SERDES nodes ('serdes0', 'serdes1', 'serdes4') that share the exact same bug.
--
commit c37d528887d49433e9d33970e77ad622c557ad5e
Author: Gokul Praveen <g-praveen@ti.com>
arm64: dts: ti: Add PLL1 refclk to J784S4 SoC SERDES node
This commit adds the PLL1 refclk to the clocks and clock-names parameters
for the SERDES2 node. It addresses a multilink configuration failure that
occurs without PLL1 being present in the clocks list.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> index 78fcd0c40abcf..da8d582574d03 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-main.dtsi
> @@ -122,8 +122,9 @@ serdes2: serdes@5020000 {
> resets = <&serdes_wiz2 0>;
> reset-names = "torrent_reset";
> clocks = <&serdes_wiz2 TI_WIZ_PLL0_REFCLK>,
> + <&serdes_wiz2 TI_WIZ_PLL1_REFCLK>,
> <&serdes_wiz2 TI_WIZ_PHY_EN_REFCLK>;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the same fix need to be applied to
the other identical serdes nodes?
Other nodes like serdes0, serdes1, and serdes4 in
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi share the exact same
configuration issue where TI_WIZ_PLL1_REFCLK is in assigned-clocks but absent
from clocks:
clocks = <&serdes_wiz0 TI_WIZ_PLL0_REFCLK>,
<&serdes_wiz0 TI_WIZ_PHY_EN_REFCLK>;
clock-names = "refclk", "phy_en_refclk";
assigned-clocks = <&serdes_wiz0 TI_WIZ_PLL0_REFCLK>,
<&serdes_wiz0 TI_WIZ_PLL1_REFCLK>,
<&serdes_wiz0 TI_WIZ_REFCLK_DIG>;
Since serdes0 is also configured for multilink (PCIe + USB), will its
configuration fail without a similar update?
> - clock-names = "refclk", "phy_en_refclk";
> + clock-names = "refclk","pll1_refclk", "phy_en_refclk";
[Severity: Low]
Will this addition cause make dtbs_check to fail?
Adding a third item to clock-names exceeds the currently defined items in the
phy-cadence-torrent.yaml binding.
Even if a subsequent patch in the series updates the schema by modifying
maxItems and the enum for the second item, dt-schema enforces
additionalItems: false for arrays.
Unless a third item definition is explicitly added to the items array in the
schema, won't validation fail for this node?
[Severity: Low]
this isn't a bug, but there is a missing space after the first comma.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630134324.61085-1-g-praveen@ti.com?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 13:43 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] Add support for dual port USXGMII+SGMII Gokul Praveen
2026-06-30 13:43 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Add PLL1 refclk to J784S4 SoC SERDES node Gokul Praveen
2026-06-30 13:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 13:43 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: cadence-torrent: Update property values to support 3 clocks Gokul Praveen
2026-06-30 13:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 17:05 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630135354.4D7F01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=g-praveen@ti.com \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox