From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/12] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 11:12:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707111239.321161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707101821.173319-10-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Probe unconditionally fails with -ENODEV due to incorrect argument passed to spmi_get_parent_spmi_device().
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v11 09/12] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() ---
commit 18513faccc988052c6a64fb21c4bfcddad28f6e4
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add()
This patch registers a new SPMI sub-device for the EUSB2 repeater and
initializes its own regmap with the sub-device's specific base address
from the device tree, replacing the parent SPMI device syscon approach.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c
> index efeec4709a15d..a8542da2b4624 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -260,15 +265,21 @@ static int eusb2_repeater_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!rptr->cfg)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - rptr->regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL);
> - if (!rptr->regmap)
> + sparent = spmi_get_parent_spmi_device(dev->parent);
> + if (!sparent)
> return -ENODEV;
[Severity: High]
Will this cause the probe to unconditionally fail with -ENODEV?
Since dev corresponds to the platform device (the SPMI sub-device), and
dev->parent is the PMIC (the actual SPMI device), passing dev->parent to
spmi_get_parent_spmi_device() makes it evaluate the grandparent of the
sub-device, which is the SPMI controller.
Because the controller's type is spmi_ctrl_type, the internal check for
parent->type == &spmi_dev_type will fail, returning NULL.
Should this pass dev instead of dev->parent?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707101821.173319-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=9
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 10:18 [PATCH v11 00/12] SPMI: Implement sub-devices and migrate drivers AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 01/12] spmi: Fix potential use-after-free by grabbing of_node reference AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 02/12] spmi: Remove redundant dev_name() print in spmi_device_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 03/12] spmi: Print error status with %pe format AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 04/12] spmi: Remove unneeded goto in spmi_device_add() error path AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 05/12] spmi: Implement spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() and devm variant AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 11:13 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 06/12] spmi: Add helper to get a parent SPMI device AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 07/12] nvmem: qcom-spmi-sdam: Migrate to devm_spmi_subdevice_alloc_and_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 11:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 08/12] power: reset: qcom-pon: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 11:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 09/12] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 11:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 10/12] misc: qcom-coincell: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 11:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 11/12] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-07 11:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 10:18 ` [PATCH v11 12/12] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-iadc: Remove regmap R/W wrapper functions AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707111239.321161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox