From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guangshuo Li" <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: ti: omap-usb2: fix OF node leak at probe
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:23:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708082301.93F181F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708081254.734892-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing return value check for `omap_usb2_enable_clocks()` in `omap_usb_init()` leads to bus faults and clock framework warnings.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] phy: ti: omap-usb2: fix OF node leak at probe ---
commit afaeba96304035f84f232912a2828b3d807db811
Author: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
phy: ti: omap-usb2: fix OF node leak at probe
omap_usb2_probe() parses the ctrl-module phandle and then looks up the
corresponding platform device.
of_parse_phandle() returns a device node with a reference that must be
dropped by the caller. The driver currently keeps the device reference
taken by of_find_device_by_node() until unbind, but never drops the
temporary OF node reference taken by of_parse_phandle().
Drop the OF node reference after of_find_device_by_node() has consumed
the node.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/ti/phy-omap-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/ti/phy-omap-usb2.c
> index 1eb252604441b..660df3181e4f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/ti/phy-omap-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/ti/phy-omap-usb2.c
> @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static int omap_usb2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> control_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(control_node);
> + of_node_put(control_node);
> if (!control_pdev) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get control device\n");
> return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a pre-existing
issue with how clock enablement failures are handled:
drivers/phy/ti/phy-omap-usb2.c:omap_usb_init() {
...
omap_usb2_enable_clocks(phy);
if (phy->flags & OMAP_USB2_CALIBRATE_FALSE_DISCONNECT) {
...
val = omap_usb_readl(phy->phy_base, USB2PHY_ANA_CONFIG1);
...
}
If omap_usb2_enable_clocks() fails, it returns a negative error code and
rolls back any enabled clocks. Because omap_usb_init() ignores this error,
it assumes the clocks are enabled and proceeds to access memory-mapped
hardware registers.
Can accessing unclocked hardware here trigger a synchronous external abort
(bus fault) on OMAP platforms?
Furthermore, because omap_usb_init() falsely returns success, the PHY
framework will eventually call omap_usb_exit():
drivers/phy/ti/phy-omap-usb2.c:omap_usb_exit() {
struct omap_usb *phy = phy_get_drvdata(x);
return omap_usb2_disable_clocks(phy);
}
Will this attempt to disable clocks that were never successfully enabled,
triggering a warning in the clock framework about unbalanced disables?
Should we check the return value of omap_usb2_enable_clocks() and propagate
the error to avoid these issues?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708081254.734892-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 8:12 [PATCH] phy: ti: omap-usb2: fix OF node leak at probe Guangshuo Li
2026-07-08 8:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708082301.93F181F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox