From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:13:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721131358.E53A41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721-qcom-usb-phy-fix-null-v5-2-a181e2adbd2d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Asynchronous pm_runtime_put() before devm_of_phy_provider_register() can cause an async suspend race if registration fails.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v5 2/5] phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot ---
commit 4e67cff2d4e3ab76976662b7c3a8f55faa25f2bd
Author: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot
This commit takes a runtime PM usage reference with pm_runtime_get_noresume()
before enabling runtime PM. It then releases the reference once the PHYs
have been created to prevent the device from being runtime suspended during
the creation window.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-usbc.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-usbc.c
> index ab3055bb5b0c1..4317224070fd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-usbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-usbc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1987,17 +1993,21 @@ static int qmp_usbc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(qmp->dp_phy)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->dp_phy);
> dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY: %d\n", ret);
> - goto err_node_put;
> + goto err_pm_put;
> }
> phy_set_drvdata(qmp->dp_phy, qmp);
> }
>
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +
> of_node_put(np);
>
> phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, qmp_usbc_phy_xlate);
>
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
[Severity: High]
Since pm_runtime_put() queues an asynchronous idle notification, is there a
race condition here if devm_of_phy_provider_register() fails?
If devm_of_phy_provider_register() returns an error, the function returns
immediately and triggers devm unwinding. This unwinding will call
pm_runtime_disable() due to the earlier devm_pm_runtime_enable() call.
If pm_runtime_disable() cancels the pending asynchronous idle/suspend work,
could the hardware be left in an incorrect active power state?
Would it be safer to move devm_of_phy_provider_register() before
pm_runtime_put(dev), and use the err_pm_put label (which safely uses the
synchronous pm_runtime_put_noidle()) if it fails?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721-qcom-usb-phy-fix-null-v5-0-a181e2adbd2d@oss.qualcomm.com?part=2
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 13:05 [PATCH v5 0/5] phy: qcom: Fix possible NULL-deref and runtime PM race conditions Loic Poulain
2026-07-21 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot Loic Poulain
2026-07-21 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: " Loic Poulain
2026-07-21 13:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-21 13:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-07-21 14:22 ` Loic Poulain
2026-07-21 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] phy: qcom: qmp-usb-legacy: Fix possible NULL-deref on early runtime suspend Loic Poulain
2026-07-21 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] phy: qcom: qmp-usb-legacy: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot Loic Poulain
2026-07-21 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] phy: qcom: snps-femto-v2: Fix possible NULL-deref on early runtime suspend Loic Poulain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721131358.E53A41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox