From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Loic Poulain" <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] phy: qcom: snps-femto-v2: Fix possible NULL-deref on early runtime suspend
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:56:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722135658.619991F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722-qcom-usb-phy-fix-null-v6-5-534f7e61b9a6@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch leaves a window on the devm_phy_create() error path where a concurrent sysfs write could trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the runtime PM suspend callback.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v6 5/7] phy: qcom: snps-femto-v2: Fix possible NULL-deref on early runtime suspend ---
commit a0879a68c7ebe908247653778b80f7d2758ec42f
Author: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>
phy: qcom: snps-femto-v2: Fix possible NULL-deref on early runtime suspend
This commit holds a runtime PM usage reference during probe to prevent early
runtime suspend callbacks from dereferencing uninitialized PHY data. It also
converts the runtime PM enable call to its devres-managed variant to ensure
proper cleanup on driver removal.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -611,6 +621,7 @@ static int qcom_snps_hsphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
> dev_err(dev, "failed to create phy, %d\n", ret);
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does dropping the usage reference here
leave the device vulnerable to a NULL pointer dereference?
If devm_phy_create() fails, the driver drops its runtime PM usage count
and returns. Because devm_pm_runtime_enable() is used, runtime PM is not
disabled synchronously, but is deferred to devres cleanup.
In this window, could a concurrent sysfs write to power/control (e.g.,
from udev rules) trigger an asynchronous suspend?
Since devres cleanup calls pm_runtime_disable() which waits for any
in-progress suspend to complete rather than canceling it, and
dev_set_drvdata() is bypassed on this error path, wouldn't the runtime
suspend callback retrieve and dereference a NULL pointer?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260722-qcom-usb-phy-fix-null-v6-0-534f7e61b9a6@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 13:45 [PATCH v6 0/7] phy: qcom: Fix possible NULL-deref and runtime PM race conditions Loic Poulain
2026-07-22 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot Loic Poulain
2026-07-22 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] phy: qcom: qmp-usbc: " Loic Poulain
2026-07-22 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] phy: qcom: qmp-usb-legacy: Fix possible NULL-deref on early runtime suspend Loic Poulain
2026-07-22 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] phy: qcom: qmp-usb-legacy: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot Loic Poulain
2026-07-22 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] phy: qcom: snps-femto-v2: Fix possible NULL-deref on early runtime suspend Loic Poulain
2026-07-22 13:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-22 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] phy: qcom: qmp-usb: " Loic Poulain
2026-07-22 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] phy: qcom: qmp-usb: Prevent unnecessary PM runtime suspend at boot Loic Poulain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722135658.619991F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox