From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hongyan Xu" <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:42:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728134202.245601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728133418.103-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Race Condition and Missing Locking on Shared MMIO Registers
- [High] State Synchronization / Logic Error: Stale state reads during extcon notifications
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH RESEND] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work ---
commit 5e11b6ff613354cecc643a7e40d800215b789869
Author: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work
ns2_drd_phy_probe() initializes wq_extcon. Both GPIO IRQs and the probe
tail can queue it. This patch adds a managed cleanup action to cancel
the delayed work on teardown, preventing it from running after resources
are freed.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
> index 8473fa5745296..d0959668df793 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c
> @@ -342,6 +349,10 @@ static int ns2_drd_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&driver->wq_extcon, extcon_work);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the asynchronous execution of
extcon_work() risk corrupting shared MMIO registers?
extcon_work() calls connect_change(), which does read-modify-write operations
on registers like ICFG_FSM_CTRL without locking:
drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c:connect_change() {
...
val = readl(driver->icfgdrd_regs + ICFG_FSM_CTRL);
...
val &= ~(DRD_HOST_MODE | DRD_DEVICE_MODE);
writel(val, driver->icfgdrd_regs + ICFG_FSM_CTRL);
...
}
Concurrently, PHY framework operations like ns2_drd_phy_init() and
ns2_drd_phy_poweron() invoked by consumers can modify the exact same registers
on different CPUs:
drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c:ns2_drd_phy_init() {
...
val = readl(driver->icfgdrd_regs + ICFG_FSM_CTRL);
if (data->new_state == EVT_HOST) {
val &= ~DRD_DEVICE_MODE;
val |= DRD_HOST_MODE;
...
writel(val, driver->icfgdrd_regs + ICFG_FSM_CTRL);
}
Should there be a spinlock serializing these register accesses across PHY ops
and the extcon workqueue?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the state update order in
extcon_work() cause consumer drivers to read stale state?
The workqueue synchronously notifies consumers via extcon_set_state_sync()
before saving the new state:
drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns2-usbdrd.c:extcon_work() {
...
extcon_set_state_sync(driver->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, true);
pr_debug("Host cable connected\n");
driver->data->new_state = EVT_HOST;
connect_change(driver);
...
}
Since extcon_set_state_sync() is a blocking notifier chain, consumer drivers
execute their callbacks immediately. If a consumer reacts by calling phy_init()
or phy_power_on(), those functions will read the old, unmodified
data->new_state, which could result in incorrect hardware configurations.
Should the internal state and hardware configurations be fully updated prior to
emitting the extcon notification?
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ns2_drd_phy_cancel_work, driver);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> driver->id_irq = gpiod_to_irq(driver->id_gpiod);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728133418.103-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 13:34 [PATCH RESEND] phy: broadcom: ns2-usbdrd: cancel delayed work Hongyan Xu
2026-07-28 13:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728134202.245601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=getshell@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox