Linux-PHY Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Felix Gu" <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix error handling in sp_uphy_init()
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:23:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803152310.42DE41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803-sunplus-usb3-v1-1-5a562524c869@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Kernel panic due to dereferencing an invalid error pointer from nvmem_cell_get.
- [Medium] Memory leak of the buffer returned by nvmem_cell_read.
- [Medium] Unvalidated array access may lead to an out-of-bounds read.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix error handling in sp_uphy_init() ---
commit bbdc3fb921cb2657598b63724660355fd956b455
Author: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>

phy: sunplus: fix error handling in sp_uphy_init()

Fixes the error paths in sp_uphy_init() to correctly undo initialization
steps. It returns directly if clock enable fails, releases the clock if
reset deassert fails, and asserts reset and clock if disconnect voltage
update fails.

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> index 637a5fbae6d9a..0ad4c7160d17c 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int sp_uphy_init(struct phy *phy)
>  	/* disconnect voltage */
>  	ret = update_disc_vol(usbphy);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at update_disc_vol()
called here in drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c, is there a potential
dereference of an invalid pointer?

If nvmem_cell_get() fails and returns an error pointer other than
-EPROBE_DEFER (such as -ENOENT), or if it returns NULL, the code doesn't
return early. It falls through and passes this invalid pointer directly to
nvmem_cell_read():

	cell = nvmem_cell_get(usbphy->dev, disc_name);
	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cell)) {
		if (PTR_ERR(cell) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
	}

	otp_v = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
	nvmem_cell_put(cell);

Will this cause a panic when nvmem_cell_read() attempts to dereference the
cell pointer?

[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does update_disc_vol() leak the buffer
returned by nvmem_cell_read()?

	otp_v = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
	nvmem_cell_put(cell);

	if (!IS_ERR(otp_v)) {
		set = *(otp_v + 1);
		...

The nvmem_cell_read() function returns a dynamically allocated buffer that
the caller is responsible for freeing. It appears otp_v is never passed to
kfree() before the function returns, which would result in a memory leak.

[Severity: Medium]
This is another pre-existing issue, but could the array access in
update_disc_vol() lead to an out-of-bounds read?

	otp_v = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
	nvmem_cell_put(cell);

	if (!IS_ERR(otp_v)) {
		set = *(otp_v + 1);

The size of the read buffer is provided in otp_l. If a device tree
incorrectly provides a 1-byte nvmem cell, unconditionally accessing the
second byte of the buffer at *(otp_v + 1) without checking if otp_l is at
least 2 might lead to reading out-of-bounds memory.

>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err_reset;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803-sunplus-usb3-v1-1-5a562524c869@gmail.com?part=1

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 15:15 [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix error handling in sp_uphy_init() Felix Gu
2026-08-03 15:22 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-08-03 15:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 16:26 ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803152310.42DE41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox