From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Felix Gu" <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix crash when the disc_vol nvmem cell is missing
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:29:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804142908.CCE8E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804-sunplus-v1-1-79f52226cb50@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing length check on the dynamically sized buffer returned by nvmem_cell_read() leads to a heap out-of-bounds read and potential information leak to MMIO.
- [High] Clock and reset resource leak in sp_uphy_init() error path when update_disc_vol() fails.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix crash when the disc_vol nvmem cell is missing ---
commit 3ff3eec8ebe3bd1dab2325248c9d68c39dbf60d4
Author: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
phy: sunplus: fix crash when the disc_vol nvmem cell is missing
nvmem_cell_get() can fail with errors other than -EPROBE_DEFER, but
update_disc_vol() only handled -EPROBE_DEFER and then called
nvmem_cell_read() with the error pointer, crashing the kernel.
Fall back to the default disconnect voltage on a failed cell lookup,
and free the buffer returned by nvmem_cell_read().
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> index 637a5fbae6d9a..94146118e9c2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> @@ -81,12 +81,13 @@ static int update_disc_vol(struct sp_usbphy *usbphy)
> char *disc_name = "disc_vol";
> ssize_t otp_l = 0;
> char *otp_v;
> - u32 val, set;
> + u32 val, set = OTP_DISC_LEVEL_DEFAULT;
>
> cell = nvmem_cell_get(usbphy->dev, disc_name);
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cell)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(cell)) {
> if (PTR_ERR(cell) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but if update_disc_vol()
returns -EPROBE_DEFER here, do we leak the clock and reset resources in
sp_uphy_init()?
In sp_uphy_init():
ret = clk_prepare_enable(usbphy->phy_clk);
if (ret)
goto err_clk;
ret = reset_control_deassert(usbphy->rstc);
if (ret)
goto err_reset;
...
ret = update_disc_vol(usbphy);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
It looks like this returns directly instead of routing to the err_reset and
err_clk cleanup labels.
> + goto out;
> }
>
> otp_v = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
> @@ -96,11 +97,12 @@ static int update_disc_vol(struct sp_usbphy *usbphy)
> set = *(otp_v + 1);
> set = (set << (sizeof(char) * 8)) | *otp_v;
> set = (set >> usbphy->disc_vol_addr_off) & J_DISC;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it safe to unconditionally access two
bytes from the nvmem buffer without checking the returned length (otp_l)?
The nvmem_cell_read() function dynamically allocates a buffer sized exactly
to the cell's byte count. If the NVMEM cell is defined as 1 byte in the
device tree, wouldn't *(otp_v + 1) result in a slab out-of-bounds read?
> + if (set == 0)
> + set = OTP_DISC_LEVEL_DEFAULT;
> + kfree(otp_v);
> }
>
> - if (IS_ERR(otp_v) || set == 0)
> - set = OTP_DISC_LEVEL_DEFAULT;
> -
> +out:
> val = readl(usbphy->phy_regs + CONFIG7);
> val = (val & ~J_DISC) | set;
> writel(val, usbphy->phy_regs + CONFIG7);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804-sunplus-v1-1-79f52226cb50@gmail.com?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 13:58 [PATCH] phy: sunplus: fix crash when the disc_vol nvmem cell is missing Felix Gu
2026-08-04 14:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 10:22 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804142908.CCE8E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox