Linux-PHY Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Felix Gu" <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
	vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: sunplus: fix ERR_PTR deref in update_disc_vol()
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 13:38:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807133827.570261F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807-sunplus-v2-2-d5379c664dfc@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing validation of nvmem cell length can lead to an out-of-bounds read or ZERO_SIZE_PTR dereference.
- [High] Clock and reset control resources are leaked due to unbalanced operations in `sp_uphy_init()` error paths.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: sunplus: fix ERR_PTR deref in update_disc_vol() ---
commit ec8ef9e1698074ff5a592bf46bc32ad0bdd396db
Author: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>

phy: sunplus: fix ERR_PTR deref in update_disc_vol()

nvmem_cell_get() returns ERR_PTR on failure. The code previously fell through
to nvmem_cell_read(), dereferencing the invalid pointer. This patch skips the
read and writes the default disconnect voltage when the lookup fails.

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> index 842087bdfba53..eb834788ea2fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/sunplus/phy-sunplus-usb2.c
> @@ -84,9 +84,10 @@ static int update_disc_vol(struct sp_usbphy *usbphy)
>  	u32 val, set = OTP_DISC_LEVEL_DEFAULT;
>  
>  	cell = nvmem_cell_get(usbphy->dev, disc_name);
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cell)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(cell)) {
>  		if (PTR_ERR(cell) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>  			return -EPROBE_DEFER;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this return path leak the clock and
reset control references?

When update_disc_vol() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, the caller sp_uphy_init()
returns the error directly without performing cleanup:

sp_uphy_init() {
        ...
        ret = clk_prepare_enable(usbphy->phy_clk);
        if (ret)
                goto err_clk;

        ret = reset_control_deassert(usbphy->rstc);
        if (ret)
                goto err_reset;
        ...
        ret = update_disc_vol(usbphy);
        if (ret < 0)
                return ret;
        ...
}

This early return bypasses the err_reset and err_clk cleanup labels, leading
to unbounded incrementing of reference counts on subsequent retries if the
nvmem provider is not yet ready.

> +		goto skip_nvmem_read;
>  	}
>  
>  	otp_v = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but should the length of the
nvmem cell returned in otp_l be validated?

If nvmem_cell_read() returns a cell with a length of 0, the allocator returns
ZERO_SIZE_PTR which passes the !IS_ERR() check. Dereferencing this pointer
would trigger a page fault:

	if (!IS_ERR(otp_v)) {
		set = *(otp_v + 1);
		set = (set << (sizeof(char) * 8)) | *otp_v;

If the cell length is 1, *(otp_v + 1) would cause an out-of-bounds read.

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807-sunplus-v2-0-d5379c664dfc@gmail.com?part=2

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07 13:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] phy: sunplus: fix two issues in update_disc_vol() Felix Gu
2026-08-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] phy: sunplus: fix memory leak " Felix Gu
2026-08-07 13:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: sunplus: fix ERR_PTR deref " Felix Gu
2026-08-07 13:38   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807133827.570261F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox