From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rustam Adilov" <adilov@disroot.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce reset controller struct
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:26:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815092632.863DB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815091340.26910-5-adilov@disroot.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The newly introduced PHY reset is deasserted too late (in `rtk_phy_init()`), causing fatal MMIO register accesses during `probe()` if the static configuration omits explicit initializers.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v7 4/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce reset controller struct ---
commit f14473a9b55e70977d451ec39af7f337818751bd
Author: Rustam Adilov <adilov@disroot.org>
phy: realtek: usb2: introduce reset controller struct
This commit introduces a reset_control struct to the driver to handle
deasserting the usb2 phy reset line using
devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive().
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c
> index 5e483c853f02f..2ddad7be73534 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -676,6 +678,15 @@ static int rtk_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> if (!rtk_phy)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (rtk_phy->phy_rst) {
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(rtk_phy->phy_rst);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + usleep_range(5000, 6000);
> + }
> +
[ ... ]
> @@ -1055,6 +1066,11 @@ static int rtk_usb2phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> rtk_phy->num_phy = phy_cfg->num_phy;
>
> + rtk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(rtk_phy->phy_rst))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rtk_phy->phy_rst),
> + "usb2 phy reset is not working\n");
> +
> ret = parse_phy_data(rtk_phy);
[Severity: High]
Can this cause a bus hang or read timeout during probe()?
Since the newly introduced reset is only deasserted later when consumers
call rtk_phy_init(), the IP is still held in reset here.
However, parse_phy_data() can perform direct MMIO reads against the PHY to
cache default values if the static configuration lacks explicit initializers:
drivers/phy/realtek/phy-rtk-usb2.c:update_dc_driving_level() {
...
if (!phy_cfg->page0[4].addr) {
rtk_phy_set_page(phy_reg, 0);
phy_cfg->page0[4].addr = PAGE0_0XE4;
phy_cfg->page0[4].data = rtk_phy_read(phy_reg, PAGE0_0XE4);
}
...
}
Will this cause issues when interacting with the PHY registers while the
device is still in reset?
> if (ret)
> goto err;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260815091340.26910-1-adilov@disroot.org?part=4
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 9:13 [PATCH v7 0/6] phy: realtek: usb2: support for RTL9607C USB2 PHY Rustam Adilov
2026-08-15 9:13 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce phy_reg_desc struct to the driver Rustam Adilov
2026-08-15 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-15 9:13 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce read and write functions to phy_reg_desc struct Rustam Adilov
2026-08-15 9:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-15 9:13 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: realtek,usb2phy.yaml: extend for resets and RTL9607C support Rustam Adilov
2026-08-15 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-15 9:13 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] phy: realtek: usb2: introduce reset controller struct Rustam Adilov
2026-08-15 9:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-15 9:13 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] phy: realtek: usb2: add support for RTL9607C USB2 PHY Rustam Adilov
2026-08-15 9:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-15 9:13 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] phy: realtek: Make configs available for MACH_REALTEK_RTL Rustam Adilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260815092632.863DB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=adilov@disroot.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox