From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, media-ci@linuxtv.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 4/5] media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 12:07:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906120708.8BCE81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v16-4-f7bd68b5369f@linaro.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The Kconfig selects a non-existent symbol `PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2`.
- [High] Missing `phy_exit()` cleanup for successfully initialized PHYs on probe and registration error paths.
- [Medium] Ignored return values from PHY API configuration functions.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential NULL pointer dereference of `csiphy->cfg.csi2` if streaming is started before the sensor subdevice is bound.
--
commit 55545599c66ba86b7d549259aecbc5a1c20f76a5
Author: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices
This commit adds the ability to use a PHY pointer which interacts with the
standard PHY API. If no PHYs are present in the DT, it falls back to the
legacy configuration method.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> index 4eda48cb1adf0..1edc5e5a1829e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ config VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS
> select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> select VIDEOBUF2_DMA_SG
> select V4L2_FWNODE
> + select PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2
[Severity: High]
Does the symbol PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2 exist in the kernel tree?
Selecting a non-existent Kconfig symbol can cause unmet direct dependency
warnings and potentially silent build failures, leaving required features
disabled.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
> index 539ac4888b608..e00748dd83b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
[ ... ]
> +static int csiphy_stream_on(struct csiphy_device *csiphy)
> +{
> + u8 bpp = csiphy_get_bpp(csiphy->res->formats->formats, csiphy->res->formats->nformats,
> + csiphy->fmt[MSM_CSIPHY_PAD_SINK].code);
> + struct csiphy_lanes_cfg *lncfg = &csiphy->cfg.csi2->lane_cfg;
> + struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *dphy_cfg;
> + union phy_configure_opts dphy_opts = { 0 };
> + struct device *dev = csiphy->camss->dev;
> + u8 num_lanes = lncfg->num_data;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this code dereference
csiphy->cfg.csi2 while it is NULL?
If userspace opens a video node and issues VIDIOC_STREAMON before the sensor
subdevice binds (or if the sensor never binds), csiphy->cfg.csi2 will remain
uninitialized. The code here dereferences it to read lncfg->num_data before
validating if a sensor is actually present.
> + s64 link_freq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dphy_cfg = &dphy_opts.mipi_dphy;
> +
> + link_freq = camss_get_link_freq(&csiphy->subdev.entity, bpp, num_lanes);
> +
> + if (link_freq < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Cannot get CSI2 transmitter's link frequency\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk(link_freq, num_lanes, dphy_cfg);
> +
> + phy_set_mode(csiphy->phy, PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY);
> +
> + ret = phy_configure(csiphy->phy, &dphy_opts);
[Severity: Medium]
Should the return values of phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk() and
phy_set_mode() be checked?
If phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk() fails (for example, with a
bad link_freq), dphy_opts will remain untouched. Passing this zero-initialized
structure to phy_configure() could then misconfigure the hardware.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> index 2123f6388e3d7..84097d82d99c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4832,14 +4890,21 @@ static int camss_init_subdevices(struct camss *camss)
> unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> + camss_detect_legacy_phy(camss);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < camss->res->csiphy_num; i++) {
> - ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init(camss, &camss->csiphy[i],
> - &res->csiphy_res[i],
> - res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
> + if (!camss->legacy_phy) {
> + ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init(camss, i);
> + } else {
> + ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init_legacy(camss,
> + &camss->csiphy[i],
> + &res->csiphy_res[i],
> + res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
> + }
> +
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(camss->dev,
> - "Failed to init csiphy%d sub-device: %d\n",
> - i, ret);
> + dev_err(camss->dev, "csiphy %d init fail\n",
> + res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
> return ret;
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
Does this error path leak the PHY initialization state?
When msm_csiphy_subdev_init() succeeds, it calls phy_init(). If a later
csiphy iteration fails, or if a subsequent subdevice like vfe fails to
initialize, camss_init_subdevices() returns early. This jumps to the
err_genpd_cleanup path in camss_probe(), completely bypassing
camss_unregister_entities(), and leaving earlier successfully initialized
PHYs without a balancing phy_exit().
[ ... ]
> @@ -5131,8 +5207,10 @@ static int camss_register_entities(struct camss *camss)
>
> i = camss->res->csiphy_num;
> err_reg_csiphy:
> - for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> - msm_csiphy_unregister_entity(&camss->csiphy[i]);
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + if (csiphy_enabled(camss, &camss->csiphy[i]))
> + msm_csiphy_unregister_entity(&camss->csiphy[i]);
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: High]
Does this error path also miss calling phy_exit() for some initialized PHYs?
Because this registration cleanup loop only iterates backward from the failing
index `i`, any csiphys from `i` onward (which were initialized during the
earlier camss_init_subdevices() phase but had not reached registration yet)
will not have their msm_csiphy_unregister_entity() cleanup called. This leaves
their PHY references leaked.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260906-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v16-0-f7bd68b5369f@linaro.org?part=4
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 11:52 [PATCH v16 0/5] Add phy_get_by_of_node and devm helper Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 1/5] phy: core: Fix use-after-free in phy_get paths Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-11 20:56 ` Frank Li
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 2/5] phy: core: Add phy_get_by_of_node() Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 3/5] phy: core: Add devm_phy_get_by_of_node() Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-11 21:09 ` Frank Li
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 4/5] media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 12:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 5/5] media: qcom: camss: Use data-lanes starting at 1 for new CSIPHY mode Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 12:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 13:03 ` Nihal Kumar Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906120708.8BCE81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox