From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oleg Keri" <okerixx@gmail.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: hold a runtime PM reference in the typec callbacks
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:18:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909141841.532191F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909140345.4239-1-okerixx@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Ignored return value of qmp_combo_com_init() leads to unclocked register access crashes and init_count state corruption.
--
commit e725afa70b650e2a1f27710fa3b4e0c5a5568682
Author: Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com>
phy: qcom: qmp-combo: hold a runtime PM reference in the typec callbacks
qmp_combo_typec_switch_set() and qmp_combo_typec_mux_set() tear the common
block down and bring it straight back up, calling qmp_combo_com_exit() and
qmp_combo_com_init() with force=true. Hold a runtime PM reference across the
teardown and bringup so releasing the clocks cannot re-enter the driver's
own suspend callback.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> index c39ced168d035..c08a22681e0e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4786,6 +4787,8 @@ static int qmp_combo_typec_switch_set(struct typec_switch_dev *sw,
> qmp->orientation = orientation;
>
> if (qmp->init_count) {
> + guard(pm_runtime_active)(qmp->dev);
> +
> if (qmp->usb_init_count)
> qmp_combo_usb_power_off(qmp->usb_phy);
> qmp_combo_com_exit(qmp, true);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but I noticed the return
value of qmp_combo_com_init() is ignored just below this diff in
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c:
qmp_combo_typec_switch_set() {
...
qmp_combo_com_init(qmp, true);
if (qmp->usb_init_count)
qmp_combo_usb_power_on(qmp->usb_phy);
...
}
If qmp_combo_com_init() fails to enable clocks (e.g., clk_bulk_prepare_enable
fails), it leaves the clocks disabled and returns an error code.
Because this return value is ignored, the code proceeds to access hardware
registers via qmp_combo_usb_power_on().
Can accessing mapped peripheral registers while their clocks are disabled
cause a System Error (SError) exception on ARM/ARM64, resulting in a kernel
panic?
Additionally, if qmp_combo_com_init() fails when force=true, it can corrupt
the initialization state:
qmp_combo_com_init() {
...
if (!force && qmp->init_count++)
return 0;
...
err_decrement_count:
qmp->init_count--;
return ret;
}
The force=true flag causes the function to skip the corresponding increment
of init_count.
Does the error path need to avoid decrementing init_count when force=true?
> @@ -4853,6 +4856,8 @@ static int qmp_combo_typec_mux_set(struct typec_mux_dev *mux, struct typec_mux_s
> qmp->qmpphy_mode = new_mode;
>
> if (qmp->init_count) {
> + guard(pm_runtime_active)(qmp->dev);
> +
> if (qmp->usb_init_count)
> qmp_combo_usb_power_off(qmp->usb_phy);
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the return value of qmp_combo_com_init()
is similarly ignored in qmp_combo_typec_mux_set() in
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c:
qmp_combo_typec_mux_set() {
...
qmp_combo_com_init(qmp, true);
if (new_mode == QMPPHY_MODE_DP_ONLY) {
...
}
If the clock initialization fails here, does this also lead to subsequent
hardware accesses without active clocks?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909140345.4239-1-okerixx@gmail.com?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 14:03 [PATCH] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: hold a runtime PM reference in the typec callbacks Oleg Keri
2026-09-09 14:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 15:15 ` Oleg Keri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909141841.532191F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=okerixx@gmail.com \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox