From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wesley Cheng" <wesley.cheng@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qualcomm: qmp-combo: Differentiate clocks related to the USB block
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 01:27:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001012742.B561B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930-qmp_phy_usb_clks_v1-v1-1-d4dccc9eb263@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: clock state imbalance for usb_clks with USB4
- [High] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: unclocked register access in USB4 init path
- [Medium] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: missing clock rollback on runtime resume error
--
commit e81a462153a1ae3712754378a06c88bd963d18ee
Author: Wesley Cheng <wesley.cheng@oss.qualcomm.com>
phy: qualcomm: qmp-combo: Differentiate clocks related to the USB block
This patch splits the USB and DisplayPort clocks into a separate list that
is enabled only when the USB initialization routine is executed. It also
moves autonomous mode control to when USB is active.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> index a4f130fc33e39..f14fb8ef90289 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2678,7 +2680,11 @@ static inline void qphy_clrbits(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
>
> /* list of clocks required by phy */
> static const char * const qmp_combo_phy_clk_l[] = {
> - "aux", "cfg_ahb", "ref", "com_aux",
> + "cfg_ahb", "ref",
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const qmp_combo_usb_phy_clk_l[] = {
> + "aux", "com_aux",
> };
[Severity: High]
When these clocks are separated into usb_clks, they are no longer enabled
during qmp_combo_usb4_init().
Since qmp_combo_usb4_init() calls qmp_combo_reconfigure_phy() and
qmp_combo_usb_power_on() to access PCS and SerDes registers, will this
cause unclocked register access faults (such as a synchronous external
abort) because usb_clks are not enabled in the USB4 path?
[ ... ]
> @@ -4403,13 +4409,20 @@ static int qmp_combo_usb_init(struct phy *phy)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ret = qmp_combo_com_init(qmp, false);
> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(qmp->num_usb_clks, qmp->usb_clks);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
[Severity: High]
Just above this in qmp_combo_usb_init(), there is a check for USB4:
if (qmp->usb4_init_count) {
qmp->init_count++;
qmp->usb_init_count++;
return 0;
}
If USB4 is active, qmp->usb_init_count is incremented but usb_clks are
never enabled.
Later, qmp_combo_runtime_suspend() unconditionally disables usb_clks based
on usb_init_count:
if (qmp->usb_init_count) {
qmp_combo_enable_autonomous_mode(qmp);
clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(qmp->num_usb_clks, qmp->usb_clks);
}
Could this cause a clock disable underflow since the clocks were skipped
during initialization? Similarly, would qmp_combo_usb_exit() leak the
clocks if USB is initialized first and exited before USB4?
[ ... ]
> @@ -4701,7 +4719,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused qmp_combo_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - qmp_combo_disable_autonomous_mode(qmp);
> + if (qmp->usb_init_count) {
> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(qmp->num_usb_clks, qmp->usb_clks);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
[Severity: Medium]
If clk_bulk_prepare_enable() fails here, the function returns early. Does
this error path need to clean up qmp->pipe_clk and qmp->clks that were
enabled earlier in qmp_combo_runtime_resume()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930-qmp_phy_usb_clks_v1-v1-1-d4dccc9eb263@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 1:16 [PATCH] phy: qualcomm: qmp-combo: Differentiate clocks related to the USB block Wesley Cheng
2026-10-01 1:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001012742.B561B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wesley.cheng@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox