From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: drop duplicated update of rport->suspended
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 13:23:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001132352.E78DE1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-phy-rockchip-inno-usb2-clock-fix-v2-2-e01bf509359e@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: hotplug deadlock if rockchip_usb2phy_power_off() fails
--
commit a2dd4bb2fd5285c3bedf91d080a002423c1e6b40
Author: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: drop duplicated update of rport->suspended
rockchip_usb2phy_power_on and rockchip_usb2phy_power_off already update
rport->suspended in their success path. In case of error it's not
sensible to update rport->suspended. So drop the duplicated update.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> index 0ab054ee84cbe..e4d8abf935c1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1004,7 +1003,6 @@ static void rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!rport->suspended) {
> dev_dbg(&rport->phy->dev, "Disconnected\n");
> rockchip_usb2phy_power_off(rport->phy);
> - rport->suspended = true;
[Severity: Medium]
If rockchip_usb2phy_power_off() fails, will rport->suspended remain false?
> }
>
> /*
> * activate the linestate detection to get the next device
> * plug-in irq.
> */
> property_enable(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->ls_det_clr, true);
> property_enable(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->ls_det_en, true);
>
> /*
> * we don't need to rearm the delayed work when the phy port
> * is suspended.
> */
> mutex_unlock(&rport->mutex);
> return;
[Severity: Medium]
Since the state machine exits here without re-arming the delayed work, and
rport->suspended could remain false, does this cause a permanent loss of
hotplug detection?
Looking at rockchip_usb2phy_linestate_irq(), the IRQ handler refuses to
re-arm the state machine if the port is not suspended:
static irqreturn_t rockchip_usb2phy_linestate_irq(int irq, void *data)
{
...
if (rport->suspended && rport->port_id == USB2PHY_PORT_HOST)
rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work(&rport->sm_work.work);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
If a USB device is disconnected and the underlying regmap_write() fails due
to local hardware or MMIO failure during rockchip_usb2phy_power_off(),
could this result in a hotplug deadlock for the USB host port?
While the code appears intended to handle this error path gracefully, it
seems to inadvertently break the state machine's re-arming condition. This
issue also appears to persist in the final commit of the series.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001-phy-rockchip-inno-usb2-clock-fix-v2-0-e01bf509359e@collabora.com?part=2
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 13:12 [PATCH v2 0/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: ensure PHY is running when clock is requested Sebastian Reichel
2026-10-01 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: simplify and unify PHY op debug messages Sebastian Reichel
2026-10-01 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: drop duplicated update of rport->suspended Sebastian Reichel
2026-10-01 13:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: move suspend handling into new function Sebastian Reichel
2026-10-01 13:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: move suspend handling into clock prepare/unprepare for RK3588/RK3576 Sebastian Reichel
2026-10-01 13:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: ensure PHY is running when clock is requested Sebastian Reichel
2026-10-03 14:33 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001132352.E78DE1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox