Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node

[Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>]

在 2024/10/26 3:24, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
> On 17.10.2024 6:22 AM, Xin Liu wrote:
>> From: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>	
>> 	
>> Add the UFS Host Controller node and its PHY for QCS615 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>> ---
> 
> + Taniya (see below)
> 
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>> index fcba83fca7cf..689418466dc2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>> @@ -458,6 +458,80 @@ mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
>>   			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
>>   		};
>>   
>> +		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {
> 
> ufshc@ would be consistent with other files in dts/qcom
> 
I referred to qcom files such as sa8775p/sm8550/sm8650 etc.All use ufs@
> 
>> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>, <0x0 0x01d90000 0x0 0x8000>;
>> +			reg-names = "std", "ice";
> 
> One per line, please
Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> 
>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
>> +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
>> +			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
>> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
>> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
>> +			reset-names = "rst";
>> +
>> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>> +
>> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x300 0x0>;
>> +			dma-coherent;
>> +
>> +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_UFS_MEM QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
>> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
>> +					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
>> +					 &config_noc SLAVE_UFS_MEM_CFG QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
>> +			interconnect-names = "ufs-ddr",
>> +					     "cpu-ufs";
>> +
>> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
>> +				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
>> +			clock-names = "core_clk",
>> +				      "bus_aggr_clk",
>> +				      "iface_clk",
>> +				      "core_clk_unipro",
>> +				      "ref_clk",
>> +				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> +				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> +				      "ice_core_clk";
>> +			freq-table-hz = <50000000 200000000>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<37500000 150000000>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<75000000 300000000>;
> 
> Please try to match the order of properties present in sm8650.dtsi
Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> 
> And please use an OPP table instead of freq-table-hz (see sm8*5*50.dtsi)
Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> 
>> +
>> +			status = "disabled";
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-qmp-ufs-phy", "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
>> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;
> 
> This register region is a bit longer
I just confirmed again, there's no problem here.
> 
>> +			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>;
>> +			clock-names = "ref",
>> +				      "ref_aux",
>> +				      "qref";
>> +
>> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>> +
>> +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
>> +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
>> +
>> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> 
> The PHY is a clock provider. Normally, it's a parent of
> gcc_ufs_phy_[rt]x_symbol_n clocks.
> 
> Taniya, could you please wire that up in your patchset?
> 
> Konrad


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy