From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: add soft vbusvalid control
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:48:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7815489.EvYhyI6sBW@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c531d53-3573-4c25-a32b-79dfd5abd4cd@linaro.org>
On Friday, 13 June 2025 11:02:40 Central European Summer Time neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
> On 10/06/2025 16:07, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > With USB type C connectors, the vbus detect pin of the OTG controller
> > attached to it is pulled high by a USB Type C controller chip such as
> > the fusb302. This means USB enumeration on Type-C ports never works, as
> > the vbus is always seen as high.
> >
> > Rockchip added some GRF register flags to deal with this situation. The
> > RK3576 TRM calls these "soft_vbusvalid_bvalid" (con0 bit index 15) and
> > "soft_vbusvalid_bvalid_sel" (con0 bit index 14).
> >
> > Downstream introduces a new vendor property which tells the USB 2 PHY
> > that it's connected to a type C port, but we can do better. Since in
> > such an arrangement, we'll have an OF graph connection from the USB
> > controller to the USB connector anyway, we can walk said OF graph and
> > check the connector's compatible to determine this without adding any
> > further vendor properties.
> >
> > Do keep in mind that the usbdp PHY driver seemingly fiddles with these
> > register fields as well, but what it does doesn't appear to be enough
> > for us to get working USB enumeration, presumably because the whole
> > vbus_attach logic needs to be adjusted as well either way.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> > index b0f23690ec3002202c0f33a6988f5509622fa10e..4f89bd6568cd3a7a1d2c10e9cddda9f3bd997ed0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> > [...]
> > @@ -666,8 +679,17 @@ static void rockchip_usb2phy_otg_sm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > unsigned long delay;
> > bool vbus_attach, sch_work, notify_charger;
> >
> > - vbus_attach = property_enabled(rphy->grf,
> > - &rport->port_cfg->utmi_bvalid);
> > + if (rport->port_cfg->svbus_en.enable && rport->typec_vbus_det) {
> > + if (property_enabled(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->svbus_en) &&
> > + property_enabled(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->svbus_sel)) {
>
> Why do you check the registers since you always enable those bits on those conditions:
> rport->port_id == USB2PHY_PORT_OTG
> rport->typec_vbus_det
> rport->port_cfg->svbus_en.enable
> rport->typec_vbus_det
> Can't you us them instead ?
I did some more looking into this, and agree that I can drop the
property_enabled lines here. The other concern I had immediately (that
the bits never get turned off, which seemed fishy) isn't a concern after
all, because after sleeping on it some more, I realised that it's probably
not very likely that a USB-C connector is ever going to morph into anything
else spontaneously.
Thank you for spotting this!
>
> Neil
>
> [...]
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-16 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 14:07 [PATCH v4 0/4] RK3576 USB Enablement Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-10 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: add soft vbusvalid control Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-13 9:02 ` neil.armstrong
2025-06-13 13:08 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-16 12:48 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2025-06-10 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] phy: rockchip: usbdp: move orientation handling further down Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-13 8:51 ` neil.armstrong
2025-06-10 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] phy: rockchip: usbdp: reset USB3 and reinit on orientation switch Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-13 8:55 ` neil.armstrong
2025-06-13 13:21 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-16 7:55 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-06-10 14:07 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable USB on Sige5 Nicolas Frattaroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7815489.EvYhyI6sBW@workhorse \
--to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=alchark@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frank.wang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).