Hi,

I'm (unfortunately) not seeing any @rock-chips.com recipients ...

On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 10:54 AM CEST, Michael Riesch via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@collabora.com>
>
> The Rockchip RK3588 variant of the CSI-2 DPHY features two reset lines.
> Add the variant and allow for the additional reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@collabora.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/phy/rockchip-inno-csi-dphy.yaml       | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-inno-csi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-inno-csi-dphy.yaml
> index 5ac994b3c0aa..6755738b13ee 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-inno-csi-dphy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-inno-csi-dphy.yaml
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
>        - rockchip,rk3326-csi-dphy
>        - rockchip,rk3368-csi-dphy
>        - rockchip,rk3568-csi-dphy
> +      - rockchip,rk3588-csi-dphy
>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -39,18 +40,49 @@ properties:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
>    resets:
> -    items:
> -      - description: exclusive PHY reset line
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
>  
>    reset-names:
> -    items:
> -      - const: apb
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
>  
>    rockchip,grf:
>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>      description:
>        Some additional phy settings are access through GRF regs.
>  
> +allOf:
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - rockchip,px30-csi-dphy
> +              - rockchip,rk1808-csi-dphy
> +              - rockchip,rk3326-csi-dphy
> +              - rockchip,rk3368-csi-dphy
> +              - rockchip,rk3568-csi-dphy
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        resets:
> +          items:
> +            - description: exclusive PHY reset line
> +
> +        reset-names:
> +          items:
> +            - const: apb
> +
> +      required:
> +        - reset-names
> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        resets:
> +          minItems: 2
> +
> +        reset-names:
> +          minItems: 2
> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -59,7 +91,6 @@ required:
>    - '#phy-cells'
>    - power-domains
>    - resets
> -  - reset-names
>    - rockchip,grf
>  
>  additionalProperties: false
> @@ -78,3 +109,22 @@ examples:
>          reset-names = "apb";
>          rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
>      };
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> +
> +    soc {
> +        #address-cells = <2>;
> +        #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +        csi_dphy0: phy@fedc0000 {
> +            compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-csi-dphy";
> +            reg = <0x0 0xfedc0000 0x0 0x8000>;
> +            clocks = <&cru PCLK_CSIPHY0>;
> +            clock-names = "pclk";
> +            #phy-cells = <0>;
> +            resets = <&cru SRST_CSIPHY0>, <&cru SRST_P_CSIPHY0>;
> +            rockchip,grf = <&csidphy0_grf>;
> +            status = "disabled";
> +        };
> +    };

... which could hopefully tell us what the value is/should be for the
*required* 'power-domains' property, which is missing in this example.
IOW: the binding example is invalid according to its own binding.
(btw: you can drop the 'csi_dphy0' label)

And hopefully also for rk3568 so we can add it to rk356x-base.dtsi and
you can add it in patch 5 where it's also missing.

Grepping for "csi-dphy" in arch/arm*/boot/dts/rockchip returns:
- px30.dtsi
- rk356x-base.dtsi

With this patch set applied, we'd have a 3rd result: rk3588-base.dtsi

For all the listed compatibles, it's only actually defined in px30.dtsi.

Cheers (and sorry),
  Diederik