From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C195C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:14:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+K/q/dC9yNe+jCFDiZt50LBHeHLat+t8oK34gPDCCa0=; b=4mipb60VmLV6It yl1w6PXYiI3EahBCCgkGGM0ZG1Fj3nuaQrDm+0qggQx5nsKDQdf6wGCycIQuxn+6u+6jP4eIOfYFQ 0nK+2NLyLPX7lMHUCdFZ+JXsNrYsOOj0YT3l1BZZ+6ZsGs+7x3+STNswPYffXWMyfBb08rIhg3wwq ga5PymsFP3M3YT8YUIAnBCPMdk4vRLMm1G0yRIeMOv/3D+PgoUlY2ryuV2eX5cKLxly8WTk3MvMjs rJiekK82iG3htDAx9NNnpzwRzY/A9DUNaHbOocOPSfQz9p7iq7zAQ0xpDrVK5BaL7LDf0Wy8aodRd w87PA6SgDwQJk1SmlI0g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nPSYn-003Usf-1X; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:14:45 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nPSYZ-003Uo6-2G; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:14:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D02B82020; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75300C004E1; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:14:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1646241268; bh=SOwFFF1Iq+bs3gvz8AxW8+ACa2Xzt/OHDUy2LcN4t4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VVXBqVqWvkyQdraxGqpHYbW56m0sDK6dga0TJE2eCl12sXOukgforDdWC+PmmXqiV yLUqxyNmZ8Yh0nM9+UWYn2xspcy0vF3WB5RcIfXRMiNgci9w0K7tqELjZ/TOB7f4FH wVR90qm+bWO81OQ9sqNcpcqeYu9qrWDsTjNFNNbaLBejlLfMREfmqC4y75qM5QVZ2j AP52UGmGXuoXBWlbxabP5tpObaKrlrzhz2Ouvp5ykFMpvaePKPKi8udcmVHLDNekrX K43O+pe3eeEvIguILzcbK07en58thnRRb9Xenro9plN3zTpnzJmR7/8TvwGmbYctrm ToPC4c+sZFgIg== Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 22:44:23 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Rob Herring Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Peter Geis , "open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" , Heiko Stuebner , Johan Jonker , Jianqun Xu , Tobias Schramm , Michael Riesch , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Revert "dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng combo phy register compatible" Message-ID: References: <20220302143427.447748-1-vkoul@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220302_091431_287512_F892A918 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 02-03-22, 11:04, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:34 AM Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > This reverts commit b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng > > combo phy register compatible") as that was wrongly merged, so better to > > drop the wrong patch > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul > > --- > > I am applying this to phy-next to fix the issue > > Reverting will just cause a different warning that it is undocumented. Right, but a patch for that would fix that > The fix in the other thread won't apply either if you revert. It is not applying for me, so that needs to be updated anyways.. -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy