From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67578CCA47F for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:35:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=m/LXCp0aCY7jNziRU4kZGrnMbFKquh6O9/ku8bfxwXU=; b=T/dwCeTHozRifu oYU4chtyX7h9PYyWVIUc/tzxtIosMs5FeZJUdiEJA/e2gyayuF3lbp4Foao/w312d8V1pSQFY1cH4 MHYoIIKAr/qmdnDOI/1/dcQTh1rlifc4akJ44feo/OO0Y8LVy64i1NtEhCKLq6eqx+ZVVPtBbg5Sr WCfXp+whe0WCNbYlj3lwscgJiondSvxPxgNAANoDmea0jGc4ugh+FbVyUgKG+cMV4X5uNunf59cx5 z0g4VB00u5JZM8ZK4UYafQs4UTUZAt8otaj6miHhqalyouW0Y3aNnlx6Rkz6abCx+dRjeciy44QVg s/GX+/GoYvXfE0PNGjSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCJbf-006drD-E2; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:35:39 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCJbb-006dpO-KQ for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:35:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AD1C622E9; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF2FEC34115; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:35:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657884934; bh=AVfJz6hAs+kgFPameBwL8dCVrV6mu62fj//RcFwFdVI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gUKMR4hnkbs/CLLUl33Nkedzr4Yfirduk8yTGfhmnXXbni528zYlpNoFdDPQ3uLDt IGQRs2REVZvf3GznJmTZBf6hh85lFMuujmTya790svjziG1PiHKu/6T5/Fwfv6sSDx kYersxM4H7vOJOa/FbyjHB8OqdgEFVmzkxcL5c9G3+HhZZ1zvB4OEM/1kVZ2zO20PH GaK9qwjWyGtc69H5pe+WfDtZ2MXMGmV9yM7E6u0vpkfSN2L52H5lWDDxuRXOd+dgwg s5qowh61WNJF7tIltDvOXmH4MmEZjMD9bfAAeeSKLHVF2HfjAfx8cKQ+i8hUqdX6lq mRypnBH65poTA== Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:05:30 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Marek Szyprowski , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, Jingoo Han , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Bjorn Helgaas , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: samsung: phy-exynos-pcie: sanitize init/power_on callbacks Message-ID: References: <20220712201227.GA791612@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220712201227.GA791612@bhelgaas> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220715_043535_745128_38752AEF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.87 ) X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 12-07-22, 15:12, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 11:55:23AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 29-06-22, 00:04, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > > The exynos-pcie driver called phy_power_on() and then phy_init() for some > > > historical reasons. However the generic PHY framework assumes that the > > > proper sequence is to call phy_init() first, then phy_power_on(). The > > > operations done by both functions should be considered as one action and > > > as such they are called by the exynos-pcie driver (without doing anything > > > between them). The initialization is just a sequence of register writes, > > > which cannot be altered, without breaking the hardware operation. > > > > > > To match the generic PHY framework requirement, simply move all register > > > writes to the phy_init()/phy_exit() and drop power_on()/power_off() > > > callbacks. This way the driver will also work with the old (incorrect) > > > PHY initialization call sequence. > > > > Is the plan to merge thru pcie tree? > > I guess these patches should go together. I don't see any major > exynos series pending, but I do have two minor pci-exynos.c patches in > the queue. > > If you ack it (after resolution of your question below) I'd be happy > to take both if it doesn't cause trouble for you. Done now. -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy