From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1933DC41535 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:49:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=3PJoxc7hG4+KQtdfqo0tN4H4uapOZWWdA7syt9XmYdY=; b=JDCn25DFOCePTU vZpNa9JZ3sMhsRjJkrc2CMeiJg6mV2JDNUEiSiZHQQzS7EObY4o7IU5brQTjQ1Y1IfI+ZtIONYZCE hqytLkiw0B23+GBeVihszDN536Cv/5A7fXofwx51mKRMzCEt5W6Iu5ml0i8dpz5tGi4Oto9hbRYKi JH9qho0xF7ztaA3rNcBe5/69QjpPHzGVv3p3BANIK+nMF37ir8Y4q08KhAF5xBNX9/zbJilmC0qnQ aVN+dw00bxQJwA46G1a7TOVgia/CIRS6l/wV+hvl0mAI3GZPBh8Nw2EE0776zZAd0i/aoz17g8/v2 d0J+eyxx4czdt3df/UBg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rGhmB-006I3e-2R; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:49:27 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rGhm8-006I30-2N for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:49:26 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2811AB822DB; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6B0AC433C7; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:49:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1703260162; bh=Ag0mzWcsnW1g3n91UWrk0/4qwvTZgSOiJlVaZYR4sxk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VlDxRxG5wy4qKpfb3iXAPj2Uc6r15R51pEALVoOguck+w7rxTUgs1Xgby3rJZNH4X aie0n5cySZhL8SQ0JI70Zn4Jeexb+FDiM52jtiZqhjvg6LvIDcmcg29wi4eem6TTdD P50+IEjlxIsiOcm9fcWgSSzDH7PJUBusRPKGFbWNr4gISpI+/bmuMHTreF5WTcVIrm pIrpZVrkAQdSsebQ9W90K6cHkkF0JHyjU3EXoteXRH2y3Ei+iPCWckqgI6NaSPbvro vXNQTvmHG14Uw6zVmpqGD25Rg4sL+c0jd52jqN2lvzDHXbQiC0xPq8l2pznqs+GUg2 HoSzyldwEOq+w== Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 21:19:18 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Can Guo Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, mani@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, beanhuo@micron.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, junwoo80.lee@samsung.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Dmitry Baryshkov , Abel Vesa , Johan Hovold , "open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-qmp-ufs: Rectify SM8550 UFS HS-G4 PHY Settings Message-ID: References: <1701520577-31163-1-git-send-email-quic_cang@quicinc.com> <1701520577-31163-10-git-send-email-quic_cang@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231222_074924_924897_4FC7BE59 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 22-12-23, 15:41, Can Guo wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On 12/22/2023 1:13 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 02-12-23, 04:36, Can Guo wrote: > > > The registers, which are being touched in current SM8550 UFS PHY settings, > > > and the values being programmed are mainly the ones working for HS-G4 mode, > > > meanwhile, there are also a few ones somehow taken from HS-G5 PHY settings. > > > However, even consider HS-G4 mode only, some of them are incorrect and some > > > are missing. Rectify the HS-G4 PHY settings by strictly aligning with the > > > SM8550 UFS PHY Hardware Programming Guide suggested HS-G4 PHY settings. > > > > This fails for me, as I have picked Abels offset series, can you please > > rebase these two patches and send > > > In v8, I rebased the two changes to linux-next. Is the ask there to rebase > the two changes to phy/next? Yes these two failed to apply for me, pls rebase and post -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy