From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 713E4C77B7F for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7+c1KnO+x32GIA0b+TfwulWJLj3VXo6mEd3gBtN8o1k=; b=HFkQOjdcKAIeUi pwgvbxPR00KyYzMJwDFOYnV0dH6xFcb01jqQ5sbYhzm++7GF0oZhA1Puu6U4C42ewh5tgYKAGLqxh HV6vgg8uMHUN4h+dpGnO4czDf3/p0hsEht/LNd+5NW/29/gbMyGOMeJx6Qpr2JmplQswsGjlhDDDZ TTdpxWV7ko0NSyyylR+kKWNXI9S4fFvFSsuxr75kpCcb1dDc53cNTvjPGRZKlrv6P6RmDNKn5V/VG LgEMhp1eGL7nSvvEi2Cs81/vKjYUy6Xe6m3Q/p4o/kPRoET4t+f9lmh3YFtYa9w/2/VehTHjP0v8c rGATbpTnD4I2csHUY2Fg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uVENw-0000000FZfy-3liQ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:05:16 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uVE7s-0000000FX2k-2SVV for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:48:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4512A52F2D; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52C8FC4CEE3; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:48:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751050119; bh=t5QdGUQTKtZh/w3br7IAj5wQCJkK0wiEdu+3pRAz1b4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dtBUmgomkEfTvE9Cr09XadxUpPq1uVa7MkSN5TQTYk4779/vJjZ3fNkqtIXJm7Elc ZxaSc4fiTGY5lahUtAKOG2DG5WmI0twTmLpCIXmiy2cfOAj1ozKTWNcS2wtCx/Y6LJ DgMVSYA2lMKZnBqzXo5tXh4N7KQObpbF5as+J+Udd4VyWpDqP1VdS30qK52FDN/zYv Sv/N5mGW/6WMf2saVzbfJOxZVTptD+5+NFuLuGquqsQZ8p5mrTLy5oOhy/yFHxkskW 8OVzPQejgj5JRoaTwtpcGcHKw+0m1k/TGyTCsgtmqhdbNWUh1NdXjnocbYm9tFQspo L6VW1xfvlJ7kw== Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 11:48:38 -0700 From: Vinod Koul To: Michael Dege Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Uwe Kleine-Koenig , "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2 RESEND] phy: renesas: r8a779f0-ether-serdes: driver enhancement Message-ID: References: <20250626081723.1924070-1-michael.dege@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250627_114840_733136_20CC64F0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Michael, On 27-06-25, 04:52, Michael Dege wrote: > > > This patch set adds the following to the r8a779f0-ether-serdes driver: > > > > I have a v3 and v3 resend and both are not threaded properly, Please post properly as a series which > > is threaded and not broken... > > Please bear with me this is the first attempt to upstream a patch. I used b4 to produce and send this > patch series. I did have trouble when I tried to use b4 to resend. And ended up using "git send-email" > to resend. > I don't quite understand what you mean by threaded and what is broken. Could you please give > me a hint what is wrong? I am willing to learn and would like to get it right. See Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst "In general, the second and following parts of a multi-part patch should be sent as a reply to the first part so that they all thread together at the receiving end. Tools like git and quilt have commands to mail out a set of patches with the proper threading. " For me, patch 1,2 and cover letter appear as disjoint so hard to review the patches when they are split in my inbox. A patch series if threaded, would appear together so easy to look at it. Said that, if you are using git send-email, easiest way is to supply the whole patch series to it and not per patch basis For example: git send-email ....../dir_of_patches/ would ensure they are threaded and sent together HTH -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy