From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20EA4E6FE23 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:39:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=kT2qBRVmYm1wg/qarrpTY3F2t9ub58yHixLBh13yrbs=; b=LwTURHa0wl/Zmn KJm1kOxP9XlgOtdolcg/oNW0Ir8Gx4g2lMJecS+mm2vub/jIgufKr7T8yNVz/uDFRtsVNIs7echs/ nlJnokFRCqIQZnYe74WVqGO4xJeRopnmcYK2zI7CXoU3A7DUn3TLXMnZtwUq3hz2GKvnX1dPAGmmo 3ueoL/fkLN2U6IsXPJuRVWr6KAxoFsZo7tfPLL43KfmvbBV03NdHG6hdz5e3/tF3o81E0Xe4OjY2D uxOjulNfL9HdbS2sJ34C+qlSpVK3GoXej/Wlmg3zl9PwWvkCir8im5a/X7p838AU8KvKon2BAi4bS fJTc+9unga+ZaiomtHjg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vY6MP-0000000FqPe-3dro; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:39:49 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vY6MM-0000000FqNy-2uDu; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:39:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B62C42E23; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D560C113D0; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:39:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766511586; bh=WPIIbHhicQ4q0GfMB7fVvQcBaHETS4fW+aGWxz9VUuY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZLoULeoDl0jWzW9UgdeJyBBc0qLT/4rRqsjFYSqDo+AfDoSREU+PQxuqcS3VE2wxN 3A/pKf51i56JXCA9jt36TqfXQqcHVVpFIPZMx+Y9zPrTWxocb87FrU6/33m36VJ//7 hm3x3qM7wZx5dn9KMaUArGIRyB6rMiJa9BoadNwjS8Yr+6POlFYsayswKvc/ZvymbR fbG73cVWu10I5zX+57VHql0rOSp9eFnxUzFWDCZxrkoCi3EQT6raPj5g1oKropzaOR yaXin8Lh4SqAMEV7TH/urOnyUer9RK12dO36BvdeC/7/PllKuVdwtH+l6VGnBYzwb3 yoVcTBfUbFAeg== Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:09:42 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Nicolas Frattaroli Cc: Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Bart Van Assche , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Chunfeng Yun , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Peter Wang , Stanley Jhu , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Philipp Zabel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Chaotian Jing , Neil Armstrong , Louis-Alexis Eyraud , kernel@collabora.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/25] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Add mt8196 variant Message-ID: References: <20251218-mt8196-ufs-v4-0-ddec7a369dd2@collabora.com> <20251218-mt8196-ufs-v4-3-ddec7a369dd2@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251218-mt8196-ufs-v4-3-ddec7a369dd2@collabora.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251223_093946_751967_C3A3437D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 18-12-25, 13:54, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote: > The MediaTek MT8196 SoC's UFS controller uses three additional clocks > compared to the MT8195, and a different set of supplies. It is therefore > not compatible with the MT8195. > > While it does have a AVDD09_UFS_1 pin in addition to the AVDD09_UFS pin, > it appears that these two pins are commoned together, as the board > schematic I have access to uses the same supply for both, and the > downstream driver does not distinguish between the two supplies either. > > Add a compatible for it, and modify the binding correspondingly. Acked-by: Vinod Koul -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy