From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44254EB48F8 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:17:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RtQUDpE/1zWdXVyJde5GceyvgLKc1Z3+JQzXC31QLBs=; b=Sw6PLzcjPiac31 wQFcpKrwRmycJINZ1LjCaCN+0rtR8/IDLw5mr7mqSbEgl6HZYr3IGPWO7MXY7ZTec8TheFJHULrmv U+vowHDvB1GrUKdmHajGPdKM1M2uLyky6b4dVxoNqbfR+l5IGlD6q+bYQ/MwNcIk/blEC1vNbEz4V Vp5wyvuKxh14x+TTvKJZg6NuoZGC4pTjug/q7xUUDqGf4++dcINnN0C4mwFG55Yf3KkOUowDNdIVt 6DzOTV9nlZj4O803KTvulooPXI24ww9vl0RSbDAOuBlhNNQeCBiVmBp5/1ajz6/8bCGV2UGqzPaZn zODK9jesDn9xnjzqGmUQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vqUhE-00000001ywN-465y; Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:17:20 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vqUhE-00000001ywC-04Jt for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:17:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C4A60010; Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 606E2C4CEF7; Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:17:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770895038; bh=OE95iEv5hbPxhjUCx2mMjsub+XUE22v7OakoLEelgVE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fJNwmr+xLGPlQ/JDiqh03dsABOaOdsbwQpJBXvNEuRa/nSHhhN+ug367o00A9EJ3B LmIIL6t7HuqEqAor0q9+qFqkReSzi/qoeajF2nR0+cGr466r8L3vVXiSkjluj0N5QE h2fO6k+trYuckwiZVqQqee7aBSNFfjO85OYNHmWpCHRd2VIXge2KnPUsoGjvnGFUbx rqh78fKf75yWz0yxQXi/FiID9nA/mmGa3CNyBI7hBFe0dhCeL0NwqqA6Fhqd6ZKaCO J261hyDvN++QBfnTjjGK/VreMU1p6hDAgqJz0oSq8OS+Cp7rPTxlYFNafMbGodczpP UP3ZTow/9zkcw== Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 16:47:15 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Vladimir Oltean , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Neil Armstrong , Josua Mayer , Wolfram Sang , Tommaso Merciai , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH next] phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: Drop local devm_mux_state_get_optional() Message-ID: References: <67c8c4f9bf9f09fd0c13daedef27b82ff389ddfb.1770720452.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 12-02-26, 11:39, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 at 17:17, Vinod Koul wrote: > > Should I drop the 8bb92fd7a0407792 and it makes things easier for > > everyone and then we can pick fixed commit for 7.1 cycle.. > > Well, my pull request for MMC was broken (the mux patches didn't get > properly tested in linux-next, until it was too late), so Linus will > not take it. Yeah I saw that one, sorry for that > At this point I would say that 8bb92fd7a0407792 is still a bit > problematic as it uses the same name of the helper that the mux core > intends to use. It would be better with a phy specific name for it, so > it becomes easier to convert to the common mux helper, later on. > Although, at this point it's still okay as is, as we will need to > defer the mux core changes to v7.1 anyway. > > So up to you! In that case, I can keep as is for now. We can rename the api as a fix and proper changes can go in for 7.1 -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy