On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 02:49:14PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 08:26:12AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 02:21:31PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 09:36:27PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:50:09AM +0800, Liu Ying wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > This patch series aims to add Freescale i.MX8qxp Display Controller support. > > > > > > > > > > The controller is comprised of three main components that include a blit > > > > > engine for 2D graphics accelerations, display controller for display output > > > > > processing, as well as a command sequencer. > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To follow up i.MX8qxp TRM, I changed the controller name to "Display Controller" > > > > > instead of the previous "DPU". "DPU" is only mentioned in the SoC block > > > > > diagram and represents the whole display subsystem which includes the display > > > > > controller and prefech engines, etc. > > > > > > > > > > With an additional patch[1] for simple-pm-bus.c, this series facilitates > > > > > testing a LVDS panel on i.MX8qxp MEK. > > > > > > > > > > Please do NOT merge patch 14-19. They are only used to facilitate testing > > > > > the LVDS panel. > > > > > > > > What's the plan to conclude this work? What's the latest status? > > > > I am looking forward to have a way to use the i.MX8QXP display with > > > > mainline, but to my understanding some required changes on the SOC dtsi > > > > are not merged. > > > > > > > > Can you help? > > > > > > I planned to add display controller DT node after prefetch engine support [1] > > > is picked up so that the prefetch engine could be enabled together with the > > > display controller. Just want to avoid a DT that only enables the display > > > controller or bypasses the prefetch engine. It makes the display controller > > > driver simpler. > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251027-imx8-dc-prefetch-v5-0-4ecb6c6d4941@nxp.com/ > > > > That series is from October 2025, is there anything blocking to move it > > forward? > > It lacks a Reviewed-by tag(at least a Acked-by tag) from a drm-misc committer > for every driver patch in that series. Also, it seems that Marek(Cc'ed) is > not a big fan of [1](See i.MX95 display support discussion[2]). I was just pointed at this series, and I'm not sure why it's blocked. It looks like you were waiting for a Reviewed-by by a drm-misc maintainer, but I gave mine already and I'm a drm-misc maintainer, sooo... :) Maxime