public inbox for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] phy: qcom: edp: Add per-version LDO configuration callback
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 18:21:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2d50c56-5a3b-41f4-90a8-1ebdff4dd898@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nxoukhntz3mn6m5qca2lk6wubhwlmxoldh6xpyxx63voseiw35@5rrwfryx6vww>



On 2/7/2026 6:17 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 05:20:54PM +0800, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>> Introduce the com_ldo_config callback to support per‑PHY LDO
>> configuration.
> 
> Missing the why part. Is the driver programming incorrect values, or is
> it an optimisation? In the former case it needs Fixes, maybe cc:stable,
> maybe Reported-by, etc.
> 
Sure.. will add next version
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>> index 10cbb7d9a8a0..388226dbad7f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct phy_ver_ops {
>>   	int (*com_clk_fwd_cfg)(const struct qcom_edp *edp);
>>   	int (*com_configure_pll)(const struct qcom_edp *edp);
>>   	int (*com_configure_ssc)(const struct qcom_edp *edp);
>> +	int (*com_ldo_config)(const struct qcom_edp *edp);
>>   };
>>   
>>   struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg {
>> @@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configur
>>   	const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg;
>>   	unsigned int v_level = 0;
>>   	unsigned int p_level = 0;
>> -	u8 ldo_config;
>> +	int ret;
>>   	u8 swing;
>>   	u8 emph;
>>   	int i;
>> @@ -300,13 +301,13 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configur
>>   	if (swing == 0xff || emph == 0xff)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>> -	ldo_config = edp->is_edp ? 0x0 : 0x1;
>> +	ret = edp->cfg->ver_ops->com_ldo_config(edp);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>>   
>> -	writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>>   	writel(swing, edp->tx0 + TXn_TX_DRV_LVL);
>>   	writel(emph, edp->tx0 + TXn_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL);
>>   
>> -	writel(ldo_config, edp->tx1 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>>   	writel(swing, edp->tx1 + TXn_TX_DRV_LVL);
>>   	writel(emph, edp->tx1 + TXn_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL);
>>   
>> @@ -530,6 +531,52 @@ static int qcom_edp_com_configure_pll_v4(const struct qcom_edp *edp)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int qcom_edp_ldo_config_v3(const struct qcom_edp *edp)
>> +{
>> +	const struct phy_configure_opts_dp *dp_opts = &edp->dp_opts;
>> +	u32 ldo_config;
>> +
>> +	if (!edp->is_edp)
>> +		ldo_config = 0x0;
>> +	else if (dp_opts->link_rate <= 2700)
>> +		ldo_config = 0x81;
>> +	else
>> +		ldo_config = 0x41;
>> +
>> +	writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>> +	writel(ldo_config, edp->tx1 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_edp_ldo_config_v4(const struct qcom_edp *edp)
>> +{
>> +	const struct phy_configure_opts_dp *dp_opts = &edp->dp_opts;
>> +	u32 ldo_config;
>> +
>> +	if (!edp->is_edp)
>> +		ldo_config = 0x0;
>> +	else if (dp_opts->link_rate <= 2700)
>> +		ldo_config = 0xC1;
> 
> Lowercase hex
> 
Got it . will fix
>> +	else
>> +		ldo_config = 0x81;
>> +
>> +	writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>> +	writel(ldo_config, edp->tx1 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct phy_ver_ops qcom_edp_phy_ops_v3 = {
>> +	.com_power_on		= qcom_edp_phy_power_on_v4,
>> +	.com_resetsm_cntrl	= qcom_edp_phy_com_resetsm_cntrl_v4,
>> +	.com_bias_en_clkbuflr	= qcom_edp_com_bias_en_clkbuflr_v4,
>> +	.com_clk_fwd_cfg	= qcom_edp_com_clk_fwd_cfg_v4,
>> +	.com_configure_pll	= qcom_edp_com_configure_pll_v4,
>> +	.com_configure_ssc	= qcom_edp_com_configure_ssc_v4,
>> +	.com_ldo_config		= qcom_edp_ldo_config_v3,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct phy_ver_ops qcom_edp_phy_ops_v4 = {
>>   	.com_power_on		= qcom_edp_phy_power_on_v4,
>>   	.com_resetsm_cntrl	= qcom_edp_phy_com_resetsm_cntrl_v4,
>> @@ -537,6 +584,7 @@ static const struct phy_ver_ops qcom_edp_phy_ops_v4 = {
>>   	.com_clk_fwd_cfg	= qcom_edp_com_clk_fwd_cfg_v4,
>>   	.com_configure_pll	= qcom_edp_com_configure_pll_v4,
>>   	.com_configure_ssc	= qcom_edp_com_configure_ssc_v4,
>> +	.com_ldo_config		= qcom_edp_ldo_config_v4,
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sa8775p_dp_phy_cfg = {
>> @@ -550,7 +598,7 @@ static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sa8775p_dp_phy_cfg = {
>>   static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc7280_dp_phy_cfg = {
>>   	.aux_cfg = edp_phy_aux_cfg_v4,
>>   	.vco_div_cfg = edp_phy_vco_div_cfg_v4,
>> -	.ver_ops = &qcom_edp_phy_ops_v4,
>> +	.ver_ops = &qcom_edp_phy_ops_v3,
> 
> This looks like an extra change. Is it intentional in this patch? If so,
> mention it in the commit message.
> 
Yes.. due to kodiak ldo func not compatable with other phys, will update 
the commit message.
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_dp_phy_cfg = {
> 


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-10 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05  9:20 [PATCH 0/3] phy: qcom: edp: Add DP/eDP switch for phys Yongxing Mou
2026-02-05  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] phy: qcom: edp: Correct and clean up eDP/DP combo PHY configuration values Yongxing Mou
2026-02-06 10:47   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-09  9:00     ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-09 12:46       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-02-10  6:13         ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-13 11:08       ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-07 10:22   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-02-09  9:52     ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-09 12:47       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-02-10 10:17         ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-10 12:33           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-02-05  9:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] phy: qcom: edp: Add per-version LDO configuration callback Yongxing Mou
2026-02-06 10:52   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-10 10:19     ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-12  9:04     ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-13 11:14       ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-25  7:21         ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-07 10:17   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-02-10 10:21     ` Yongxing Mou [this message]
2026-02-05  9:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] phy: qcom: edp: Add eDP phy mode switch support Yongxing Mou
2026-02-06 11:02   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-10 10:29     ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-13 11:06       ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-25  8:00         ` Yongxing Mou
2026-02-07 10:20   ` Dmitry Baryshkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2d50c56-5a3b-41f4-90a8-1ebdff4dd898@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=yongxing.mou@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox