Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] phy: add new phy_notify_pmstate() api

[neil.armstrong@linaro.org]

On 23/07/2025 09:07, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 22-07-25, 22:04, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 02:03:22PM GMT, Peter Griffin wrote:
>>> Add a new phy_notify_pmstate() api that notifies and configures a phy for a
>>> given PM link state transition.
>>>
>>> This is intended to be by phy drivers which need to do some runtime
>>> configuration of parameters during the transition that can't be handled by
>>> phy_calibrate() or phy_power_{on|off}().
>>>
>>> The first usage of this API is in the Samsung UFS phy that needs to issue
>>> some register writes when entering and exiting the hibernate link state.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/phy/phy-core.c  | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   include/linux/phy/phy.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>> index 04a5a34e7a950ae94fae915673c25d476fc071c1..0b29bc2c709890d7fc27d1480a35cda6a826fd30 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>> @@ -520,6 +520,31 @@ int phy_notify_disconnect(struct phy *phy, int port)
>>>   }
>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_notify_disconnect);
>>>   
>>> +/**
>>> + * phy_notify_pmstate() - phy link state notification
>>
>> 'pmstate' doesn't correspond to 'link state'. So how about,
>> phy_notify_link_state()?
>>
>> s/phy/PHY (here and below)
>>
>>> + * @phy: the phy returned by phy_get()
>>> + * @state: the link state
>>> + *
>>> + * Notify the phy of some PM link state transition. Used to notify and
>>
>> Link state change is common for the PHY. So remove 'PM'.
> 
> Is it really link or phy state?

It seems to be a link state, and I think adding a way to force
a link state to a phy, which is basically the role of a phy,
more coherent.

Neil

> 
>>
>>> + * configure the phy accordingly.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns: %0 if successful, a negative error code otherwise
>>> + */
>>> +int phy_notify_pmstate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_linkstate state)
>>
>> I think you need to use 'int state' and let drivers pass their own link state
>> values. You cannot have generic link states across all peripherals.
> 
> I would avoid that, people start overloading this if we let it keep
> open! I would like to avoid the api -(ab)use
> 


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy