From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hangxiang Ma" <hangxiang.ma@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, media-ci@linuxtv.org,
robh@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 07/12] media: qcom: camss: csid: Add support for CSID 1080
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 07:32:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163768@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008-kaanapali-camss-v19-7-b2c583ef50e0@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] media: data race on aup_update and rup_update masks between process and IRQ context
- [High] media: missing IRQ mask programming prevents INFO_RUP_DONE interrupts
- [Medium] media: camss: csid-1080: data race on aup_update and rup_update bitmasks
--
commit c1ffc650d77cc9e495d5b9cec2dfa9e85e2f485e
Author: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@oss.qualcomm.com>
media: qcom: camss: csid: Add support for CSID 1080
Add support for the CSID 1080 hardware found on Kaanapali SoC.
Introduce CSID 1080 hardware resource descriptions and implement the
hardware-specific register programming, reset sequence, and BUF_DONE
interrupt handling.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-1080.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-1080.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..46e443e05195a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid-1080.c
[ ... ]
> +static void __csid_aup_rup_clear(struct csid_device *csid, int port_id)
> +{
> + /* Hardware clears the registers upon consuming the settings */
> + csid->aup_update &= ~CSID_RUP_AUP_RDI(port_id);
> + csid->rup_update &= ~CSID_RUP_AUP_RDI(port_id);
> +}
> +
> +static void __csid_aup_update(struct csid_device *csid, int port_id)
> +{
> + csid->aup_update |= CSID_RUP_AUP_RDI(port_id);
> + writel(csid->aup_update, csid->base + CSID_AUP_CMD);
> +
> + __csid_aup_rup_trigger(csid);
> +}
> +
> +static void __csid_reg_update(struct csid_device *csid, int port_id)
> +{
> + csid->rup_update |= CSID_RUP_AUP_RDI(port_id);
> + writel(csid->rup_update, csid->base + CSID_RUP_CMD);
> +
> + __csid_aup_rup_trigger(csid);
> +}
[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce a data race between process and hard IRQ context?
In process context, csid_configure_stream() updates these variables via
non-atomic bitwise OR (|=) using __csid_aup_update() and __csid_reg_update().
Concurrently, the hardware interrupt handler csid_isr() (running in hard IRQ
context) clears bits in these exact same variables via non-atomic bitwise AND
NOT (&= ~) through __csid_aup_rup_clear().
Because there is no spinlock or atomic bit operations protecting these
read-modify-write sequences, an interrupt firing on the same or another CPU
during stream configuration could cause a TOCTOU data race.
Could this lead to lost bit updates, resulting in hardware commands being
dropped or spuriously re-triggered?
[ ... ]
> +static irqreturn_t csid_isr(int irq, void *dev)
> +{
> + struct csid_device *csid = dev;
> + u32 val, buf_done_val;
> + u8 reset_done;
> + int i;
> +
> + val = readl(csid->base + CSID_TOP_IRQ_STATUS);
> + writel(val, csid->base + CSID_TOP_IRQ_CLEAR);
> +
> + reset_done = val & INFO_RST_DONE;
> +
> + buf_done_val = readl(csid->base + CSID_BUF_DONE_IRQ_STATUS);
> + writel(buf_done_val, csid->base + CSID_BUF_DONE_IRQ_CLEAR);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MSM_CSID_MAX_SRC_STREAMS_1080; i++) {
> + if (csid->phy.en_vc & BIT(i)) {
> + val = readl(csid->base + CSID_CSI2_RDIN_IRQ_STATUS(i));
> + writel(val, csid->base + CSID_CSI2_RDIN_IRQ_CLEAR(i));
> +
> + if (val & INFO_RUP_DONE)
> + csid_subdev_reg_update(csid, i, true);
[Severity: High]
Is the INFO_RUP_DONE interrupt properly unmasked?
The driver relies on the INFO_RUP_DONE interrupt to clear the pending
aup_update mask in the ISR via csid_subdev_reg_update().
However, the driver never writes to CSID_CSI2_RDIN_IRQ_MASK(i) to unmask
these interrupts, nor does it enable the corresponding top-level aggregation
bit (CSI2_RX_IRQ_STATUS) in CSID_TOP_IRQ_MASK during setup or reset.
Because the interrupts appear to be permanently masked in hardware, the
RUP_DONE interrupt might never trigger the csid_isr() independently.
Could the aup_update state be left orphaned if no BUF_DONE interrupt happens
to fire, breaking asynchronous updates?
[ ... ]
> +static int csid_reset(struct csid_device *csid)
> +{
> + unsigned long time;
> + u32 val;
> + int i;
> +
> + reinit_completion(&csid->reset_complete);
> +
> + val = INFO_RST_DONE | BUF_DONE_IRQ_STATUS;
> + writel(val, csid->base + CSID_TOP_IRQ_CLEAR);
> + writel(val, csid->base + CSID_TOP_IRQ_MASK);
> +
> + val = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < MSM_CSID_MAX_SRC_STREAMS_1080; i++) {
> + if (csid->phy.en_vc & BIT(i)) {
> + /*
> + * Only need to clear buf done IRQ status here,
> + * RUP done IRQ status will be cleared once isr
> + * strobe generated by CSID_RST_CMD
> + */
> + val |= BIT(BUF_DONE_IRQ_STATUS_RDI_OFFSET + i);
> + }
> + }
> + writel(val, csid->base + CSID_BUF_DONE_IRQ_CLEAR);
> + writel(val, csid->base + CSID_BUF_DONE_IRQ_MASK);
[Severity: High]
This appears to be where top-level masking explicitly omits
CSI2_RX_IRQ_STATUS, and CSID_CSI2_RDIN_IRQ_MASK is never programmed,
as noted above.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008-kaanapali-camss-v19-0-b2c583ef50e0@oss.qualcomm.com?part=7
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 7:14 [PATCH v19 00/12] media: qcom: camss: Add Kaanapali support Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 01/12] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy: Add Kaanapali CSI2 PHY Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 02/12] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Parametrise the common status register offset Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 22:08 ` bod
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 03/12] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Add Kaanapali support Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 22:32 ` bod
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 04/12] media: dt-bindings: Add CAMSS device for Kaanapali Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 05/12] media: qcom: camss: Add Kaanapali compatible Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 06/12] media: qcom: camss: csiphy: Add support for v2.4.0 two-phase CSIPHY Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 22:38 ` bod
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 07/12] media: qcom: camss: csid: Add support for CSID 1080 Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 08/12] media: qcom: camss: vfe: Add support for VFE 1080 Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 22:50 ` bod
2026-10-09 2:59 ` Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-09 8:39 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-09 11:36 ` Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 09/12] media: qcom: camss: tpg: Add support for v2.4.0 TPG Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 10/12] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: Add CAMSS and CSIPHY block definitions Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 8:40 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-09 8:45 ` hangxiang.ma
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: Add CCI controller nodes Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 16:16 ` Loic Poulain
2026-10-09 4:06 ` Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-08 7:14 ` [PATCH v19 12/12] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: Add camera MCLK pinctrl Hangxiang Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163768@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hangxiang.ma@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox