From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nihal Kumar Gupta" <nihal.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, media-ci@linuxtv.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom,i2c-cci: Add Hawi compatible
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 12:51:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-191032@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030-hawi-maili-camss-v3-1-9742bca8cef2@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom,hawi-cci falls back to qcom,msm8996-cci
--
commit d9dc73bf069c6c548fe2a696e7ecbd69ab96e3f3
Author: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@oss.qualcomm.com>
dt-bindings: i2c: qcom,i2c-cci: Add Hawi compatible
This commit documents the Camera Control Interface (CCI) compatible string
qcom,hawi-cci for the Qualcomm Hawi platform and adds it to the two-clock
constraint list in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
> index 1e8def25ec0ec..b2b4d4bcf7807 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - enum:
> - qcom,glymur-cci
> + - qcom,hawi-cci
> - qcom,kaanapali-cci
> - qcom,milos-cci
> - qcom,qcm2290-cci
[Severity: Medium]
As reported by Loic Poulain on v1 [1], adding qcom,hawi-cci to this enum list
under properties:compatible in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml requires device tree
nodes to specify qcom,msm8996-cci as a fallback compatible:
- items:
- enum:
- qcom,glymur-cci
- qcom,hawi-cci
...
- const: qcom,msm8996-cci # CCI v2
When a Hawi CCI controller node is probed via cci_probe() in
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c, device_get_match_data() matches the
fallback entry in cci_dt_match[] and binds the controller to the legacy
cci_v2_data configuration:
static const struct cci_data cci_v2_data = {
.num_masters = 2,
.queue_size = { 64, 16 },
.quirks = {
.max_write_len = 11,
.max_read_len = 12,
},
.max_mode = I2C_MODE_FAST_PLUS,
};
static const struct of_device_id cci_dt_match[] = {
...
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-cci", .data = &cci_v2_data},
Since newer CCI IP revisions have different hardware resources such as FIFO
and queue sizes, should qcom,hawi-cci stop falling back to qcom,msm8996-cci
and instead use a dedicated variant entry rather than reusing the msm8996
definition?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAFEp6-1Zvt0hhBd7LNx2hsyi9J+bxCT8EWN3jZ4B30SO58SCow@mail.gmail.com
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261030-hawi-maili-camss-v3-0-9742bca8cef2@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 12:43 [PATCH v3 0/5] Add CAMSS support for Qualcomm Hawi and Maili Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-30 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom,i2c-cci: Add Hawi compatible Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-30 12:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-30 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy: Add Hawi and Maili compatibles Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-30 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: media: Add CAMSS device for Hawi and Maili Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-30 12:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 13:38 ` Loic Poulain
2026-10-30 14:05 ` Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-30 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] phy: qcom-mipi-csi2: Add Hawi support Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-30 13:39 ` Loic Poulain
2026-10-30 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] media: qcom: camss: Add support for Hawi Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-10-30 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 15:04 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-30 15:25 ` Hangxiang Ma
2026-10-30 15:05 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-10-30 15:29 ` Hangxiang Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-191032@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=nihal.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox