From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: drop duplicated update of rport->suspended
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 23:16:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-198285@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-phy-rockchip-inno-usb2-clock-fix-v3-2-b20608c08b94@collabora.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: hotplug wedge on rockchip_usb2phy_power_off() error
--
commit c83a3edf6251c7ef6aad3ae18e1a303508f3dab1
Author: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: drop duplicated update of rport->suspended
This commit removes the unconditional assignments to rport->suspended in
rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work() after calling rockchip_usb2phy_power_on() and
rockchip_usb2phy_power_off(), relying on those functions to update
rport->suspended on success.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> index 0b61f152eb3f3..51afbcc40c4eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> @@ -994,7 +994,6 @@ static void rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (rport->suspended) {
> dev_dbg(&rport->phy->dev, "Connected\n");
> rockchip_usb2phy_power_on(rport->phy);
> - rport->suspended = false;
> } else {
> /* D+ line pull-up, D- line pull-down */
> dev_dbg(&rport->phy->dev, "FS/LS online\n");
> @@ -1004,7 +1003,6 @@ static void rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!rport->suspended) {
> dev_dbg(&rport->phy->dev, "Disconnected\n");
> rockchip_usb2phy_power_off(rport->phy);
> - rport->suspended = true;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
As reported by Sashiko on v2 [1], if rockchip_usb2phy_power_off() fails in
rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work() under PHY_STATE_DISCONNECT (when
property_enable() on phy_sus returns an error), rport->suspended now remains
false and rphy->clk480m stays enabled.
However, the PHY_STATE_DISCONNECT path does not check the return value of
rockchip_usb2phy_power_off() and still proceeds as if the port were
suspended, enabling ls_det_clr and ls_det_en and returning early without
rescheduling rport->sm_work:
case PHY_STATE_DISCONNECT:
if (!rport->suspended) {
dev_dbg(&rport->phy->dev, "Disconnected\n");
rockchip_usb2phy_power_off(rport->phy);
}
property_enable(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->ls_det_clr, true);
property_enable(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->ls_det_en, true);
mutex_unlock(&rport->mutex);
return;
When the next linestate interrupt fires, rockchip_usb2phy_linestate_irq()
disables ls_det_en and only restarts rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work() when
rport->suspended is true:
property_enable(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->ls_det_en, false);
property_enable(rphy->grf, &rport->port_cfg->ls_det_clr, true);
mutex_unlock(&rport->mutex);
if (rport->suspended && rport->port_id == USB2PHY_PORT_HOST)
rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work(&rport->sm_work.work);
Because rport->suspended is false, would this leave ls_det_en disabled and
rport->sm_work stopped, permanently wedging host port hotplug detection and
leaking the rphy->clk480m enable count? Should rockchip_usb2phy_sm_work()
jump to next_schedule when rockchip_usb2phy_power_off() returns an error?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261001-phy-rockchip-inno-usb2-clock-fix-v2-2-e01bf509359e@collabora.com
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105-phy-rockchip-inno-usb2-clock-fix-v3-0-b20608c08b94@collabora.com?part=2
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 23:07 [PATCH v3 0/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: ensure PHY is running when clock is requested Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-04 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: simplify and unify PHY op debug messages Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-04 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: drop duplicated update of rport->suspended Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-04 23:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: move suspend handling into new function Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-04 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: move suspend handling into clock prepare/unprepare for RK3588/RK3576 Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-04 23:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-198285@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox