From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: 'Leonard Crestez' <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
'Viresh Kumar' <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael@kernel.org>,
'Steve Muckle' <smuckle@linaro.org>
Cc: 'Anson Huang' <anson.huang@nxp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Subject: RE: [BUG] schedutil governor produces regular max freq spikes because of lockup detector watchdog threads
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 08:12:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001d38709$363d5180$a2b7f480$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: XYkGesLZd7WleXYkHe0H9k
On 2018.01.05 12:38 Leonard Crestez wrote:
> When using the schedutil governor together with the softlockup detector
> all CPUs go to their maximum frequency on a regular basis. This seems
> to be because the watchdog creates a RT thread on each CPU and this
> causes regular kicks with:
>
> cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
>
> The schedutil governor responds to this by immediately setting the
> maximum cpu frequency, this is very undesirable.
>
> The issue can be fixed by this patch from android:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9301909/
>
> The patch stalled in a long discussion about how it's difficult for
> cpufreq to deal with RT and how some RT users might just disable
> cpufreq. It is indeed hard but if the system experiences regular power
> kicks from a common debug feature they will end up disabling schedutil
> instead. No other governors behave this way, perhaps the current
> behavior should be considered a bug in schedutil.
>
> That patch now has conflicts with latest upstream. Perhaps a modified
> variant should be reconsidered for inclusion, or is there some other
> solution pending?
>
> Alternatively the watchdog threads could be somehow marked as to never
> cause increased cpufreq.
Your e-mail was very timely for me. In mid December, while testing the
minimum sampling rate change commit, I also did a reference test using
intel-cpufreq driver and schedutil governor. Under a range of
conditions 79% more package power was consumed by schedutil when compared
to: ondemand, sample rate 2 mSec; ondemand, sample rate 20 mSec;
intel_pstate driver.
I did not know about the thread and patch you referred to. Thanks.
Additionally, on otherwise mostly idle CPUs, sometimes I observe that after
the setting of max pstate, it gets left there with no update at all for
over a hundred seconds. Examples:
CPU3: 165 seconds since change to max pstate; Load 0.07%; new pstate = minimum
CPU5: 121 seconds since change to max pstate; Load 0.47%; new pstate = mid range
Reference (for me only): trace_stuff/results/pass24 samples 59797 and 59803
... Doug
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-06 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-06 16:12 Doug Smythies [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-05 20:37 [BUG] schedutil governor produces regular max freq spikes because of lockup detector watchdog threads Leonard Crestez
2018-01-05 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-08 4:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-08 13:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-08 13:20 ` Leonard Crestez
2018-01-08 15:14 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-08 15:51 ` Leonard Crestez
2018-01-09 1:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 14:43 ` Leonard Crestez
2018-01-09 15:16 ` Lucas Stach
2018-01-09 15:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 10:54 ` Juri Lelli
2018-01-10 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 14:21 ` Juri Lelli
2018-01-11 1:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 4:08 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001d38709$363d5180$a2b7f480$@net' \
--to=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=anson.huang@nxp.com \
--cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=smuckle@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).