From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: "'Vincent Guittot'" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"'Dietmar Eggemann'" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"'Juri Lelli'" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"'Steven Rostedt'" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"'Mel Gorman'" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"'open list:THERMAL'" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"'Sargun Dhillon'" <sargun@sargun.me>,
"'Tejun Heo'" <tj@kernel.org>,
"'Xie XiuQi'" <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, <xiezhipeng1@huawei.com>,
"'Srinivas Pandruvada'" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:07:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000601d59c8f$9fa191c0$dee4b540$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtDyZ5gom41S-8Nu+BMK7hPijWoZPqo0HFYkRnNmWo1UTA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
I tested both Vincent's V4 and Peter's, I called it V1.
8000 seconds intel_pstate_tracer on a very idle system.
Everything was fine.
Vincent-V4:
Maximum time between calls to the intel_pstate driver,
per CPU: 4.00813 seconds: GOOD/PASS
Total entries/exits to/from driver: 90,730:
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
228,600 aperf clocks / second / cpu.
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
Peter-V1:
Maximum time between calls to the intel_pstate driver,
per CPU: 4.00407 seconds: GOOD/PASS
Total entries/exits to/from driver: 96,440:
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
241,310 aperf clocks / second / cpu.
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
Baseline reference:
Maximum time between calls to the intel_pstate driver,
per CPU: 225.03 seconds: BAD/FAIL
Number of durations over an arbitrary threshold of
10 seconds: 379.
Total entries/exits to/from driver: 75,969:
Consistent with previous tests / expectations,
when the issue is present.
226,963 aperf clocks / second / cpu.
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
I did not do the load no-load energy test.
It is not possible for it to be a problem
if the long duration issue is solved.
I'll do the test, if someone wants the proof.
Kernels were 5.4-rc7 + linux next.
Idle governor was TEO, but this isn't actually relevant.
Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
... Doug
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-16 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-14 17:07 [PATCH v4] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-15 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 11:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 11:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 12:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 10:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 11:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 13:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 15:30 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-15 10:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-15 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 11:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-15 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 13:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 14:12 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 15:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 18:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 21:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-16 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-16 15:07 ` Doug Smythies [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000601d59c8f$9fa191c0$dee4b540$@net' \
--to=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=xiezhipeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).