From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Doug Smythies" Subject: RE: [RFT][PATCH v5 0/7] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 08:30:29 -0700 Message-ID: <000801d3bece$0e4b9090$2ae2b1b0$@net> References: <2142751.3U6XgWyF8u@aspire.rjw.lan> <001a01d3be0a$ad3a0ed0$07ae2c70$@net> xW2zeQ0g8FfdwxW30ehIAY Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: xW2zeQ0g8FfdwxW30ehIAY Content-Language: en-ca Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , 'Thomas Ilsche' Cc: 'Peter Zijlstra' , 'Linux PM' , 'Frederic Weisbecker' , 'Thomas Gleixner' , 'Paul McKenney' , 'Rik van Riel' , 'Aubrey Li' , 'Mike Galbraith' , 'LKML' , Doug Smythies List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 2018.03.18 04:01 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Below is a drop-in v6 replacement for patch [4/7]. > > With this new patch applied instead of the [4/7] the behavior should be much > more in line with the v4 behavior, so please try it if you can and let me know > if that really is the case on your systems. Yes, the idle power is back down to V4 levels. (I did not do a new graph). Some other data from this week (7 patch set + poll fix verses kernel 4.16-rc5): pipe-test: The not cross core test is the most dramatic. Using CPU's 3 and 7, or core 3, uses 6% less power and 18% performance improvement. Graphs: http://fast.smythies.com/pipe-test-one-core-power.png http://fast.smythies.com/pipe-test-one-core-times.png A couple of Phoronix tests (I didn't get very far yet): himeno: 11% performance improvement; 14% less power. compress-lzma: small performance improvement; small power improvement. mafft: performance similar; small power improvement. ... Doug