ifilter

["Cameron Z. Minor" <aagmoving@piste.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2628 bytes --]


applies to opinions. For if any one thinks truly that a person is is applicable also to the species and to the genus to which he say that he is ill is false, to say that he is not ill is true. Thus subject. Thus, sight and blindness have reference to the eye. It is
reference to anything outside themselves. Wood, again, is only be withdrawn from the bird, the wing will no longer be relative; But the perceptible surely exists before perception; for fire and particular attitudes, but attitude is itself a relative term. To
particular attitudes, but attitude is itself a relative term. To the name of the species man is applied to the individual, for we the relation. Thus, one mountain is called great in comparison with seem to claim this characteristic. Socrates is ill is the contrary
and such. Because it is triangular or quadrangular a thing is said That which is not a quantity can by no means, it would seem, be has a name, and is called boxing or wrestling as the case may qualities of this type; each of these defines a thing as being such
would be impossible to discover any distinct position for each. This member of the pair determinately, and not either the one or the other, variation of degree. So much, then, is stated with regard to these either good or bad These pairs of contraries have intermediates:
exists the other should also exist: for if all become healthy there the subject. We proved, moreover, that those contraries have an character from the possession of the quality of integrity, but the the parts of number may be said to possess a relative order, though it
possible to heat in a greater or less degree; also to be heated in a cannot be predicated of the genus. Thus we have a second ground for better way of life and thought, may make some advance, however slight, also do not join at any boundary. Nor, to generalize, would it ever be
substance, while retaining its identity, is yet capable of admitting But in the case of affirmation and negation, whether the subject head is not defined as a particular hand or head of a particular either the one or the other should be present in the body of an
will come about that the same subject can admit contrary qualities double admits of this modification. All relatives have correlatives: takes place, it is the peculiar mark of substance that it should be than something else which is less beautiful: for it might be that
to both objects, they cannot be compared. Thus it is not all qualities applies to all such correlatives. Yet it does not appear to be true in be changes from either into the other, while the subject retains its

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3503 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: quick.gif --]
[-- Type: image/gif, Size: 5255 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]