From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Doug Smythies" Subject: RE: [regression] cross core scheduling frequency drop bisected to 0c313cb20732 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 00:17:52 -0700 Message-ID: <001e01d1922f$ef219a10$cd64ce30$@net> References: <1460092854.4051.1.camel@gmail.com> <20160408064510.GK3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1460098254.5582.17.camel@gmail.com> <2428384.mEkP3EOpsR@vostro.rjw.lan> <001101d191e4$b00602d0$10120870$@net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <001101d191e4$b00602d0$10120870$@net> Content-Language: en-ca Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Mike Galbraith' Cc: 'Peter Zijlstra' , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , 'LKML' , 'Linux PM list' , 'Rik van Riel' , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 2016.04.08 15:19 Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.04.08 14:00 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, April 08, 2016 08:50:54 AM Mike Galbraith wrote: >>> On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 08:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> >>>> Cute, I thought you used governor=performance for your runs? >>> >>> I do, and those numbers are with it thus set. >> Well, this is a trade-off. >> >> 4.5 introduced a power regression here so this one goes back to the previous >> state of things. > Mike: > > Could you send me, or point me to, the program "pipe-test"? > So far, I have only found one, but it is both old and not > the same program you are running (based on print statements). > > I realize I might not be to recreate your problem scenario anyhow, > I just want to try. I still didn't find the exact same program, but I think I found some earlier version of the correct test. I get (long term average): Kernel 4.4.0-17: Powersave 3.93 usecs/loop ; Performance 3.93 usecs/loop 0.89 Kernel 4.5-rc7: Powersave 3.47 usecs/loop ; Performance 3.51 usecs/loop 1.00 Kernel 4.6-rc1: Powersave 3.84 usecs/loop ; Performance 3.88 usecs/loop 0.90 So, similar results (so far, I didn't try reverted yet). ... Doug