From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: 'Andy Tang' <andy.tang@nxp.com>
Cc: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
'Linux PM' <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
'Viresh Kumar' <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
'Stratos Karafotis' <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Subject: RE: Ask for help on governor
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:37:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002001d37577$9706a730$c513f590$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: PfELeWRWpC2CsPfENeiuYt
Hi Andy,
Could you please try the below reversion patch.
It is on top of kernel 4.15-rc3.
On my system, and for the intel_cpufrequ scaling driver,
the default sampling_rate goes back to 20000 (which works)
from 500 uSec (which doesn't), for both the conservative
and ondemand governors.
>From 2e914085991d02eb5e6a197aa75485f37742a535 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:59:44 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: Use transition_delay_us for legacy governors as well"
This reverts commit aa7519af450d3c62a057aece24877c34562fa25a.
There were issues with the default sampling_rate becoming to
short for some versions of cpufreq conservative and ondemand
governors to operate properly. The idle periods and load
calculations broke down.
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 26 --------------------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 9 ++++++++-
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 -
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 11 ++++++++++-
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 41d148a..9489901 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -530,32 +530,6 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq);
-unsigned int cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
- unsigned int latency;
-
- if (policy->transition_delay_us)
- return policy->transition_delay_us;
-
- latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
- if (latency) {
- /*
- * For platforms that can change the frequency very fast (< 10
- * us), the above formula gives a decent transition delay. But
- * for platforms where transition_latency is in milliseconds, it
- * ends up giving unrealistic values.
- *
- * Cap the default transition delay to 10 ms, which seems to be
- * a reasonable amount of time after which we should reevaluate
- * the frequency.
- */
- return min(latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER, (unsigned int)10000);
- }
-
- return LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us);
-
/*********************************************************************
* SYSFS INTERFACE *
*********************************************************************/
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 58d4f4e..6302eb4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
+ unsigned int latency;
int ret = 0;
/* State should be equivalent to EXIT */
@@ -430,7 +431,13 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (ret)
goto free_policy_dbs_info;
- dbs_data->sampling_rate = cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(policy);
+ /* policy latency is in ns. Convert it to us first */
+ latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / 1000;
+ if (latency == 0)
+ latency = 1;
+
+ /* Bring kernel and HW constraints together */
+ dbs_data->sampling_rate = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER * latency;
if (!have_governor_per_policy())
gov->gdbs_data = dbs_data;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 065f3a8..75d5bd9 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -533,7 +533,6 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int relation);
unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq);
-unsigned int cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor);
void cpufreq_unregister_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 2f52ec0..a61d7fa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -583,7 +583,16 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
goto stop_kthread;
}
- tunables->rate_limit_us = cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(policy);
+ if (policy->transition_delay_us) {
+ tunables->rate_limit_us = policy->transition_delay_us;
+ } else {
+ unsigned int lat;
+
+ tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+ lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
+ if (lat)
+ tunables->rate_limit_us *= lat;
+ }
policy->governor_data = sg_policy;
sg_policy->tunables = tunables;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-15 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <HE1PR0402MB282866171A847AE244A9F76CF3340@HE1PR0402MB2828.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2017-12-12 7:30 ` Ask for help on governor Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 16:18 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-12 16:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 3:10 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-13 6:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 6:22 ` Andy Tang
2017-12-13 6:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 16:13 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-14 1:21 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-14 2:42 ` Andy Tang
2017-12-14 18:25 ` Stratos Karafotis
2017-12-15 1:29 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-15 1:30 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-15 1:56 ` Andy Tang
2017-12-15 7:37 ` Doug Smythies [this message]
2017-12-15 9:00 ` Andy Tang
2017-12-15 14:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-15 15:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-15 18:27 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-15 23:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 1:15 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Ensure sufficiently large sampling intervals Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 2:59 ` Andy Tang
2017-12-18 4:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-18 16:11 ` Doug Smythies
2017-12-18 17:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 16:13 ` Ask for help on governor Doug Smythies
2017-12-13 16:49 ` Doug Smythies
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002001d37577$9706a730$c513f590$@net' \
--to=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=andy.tang@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox