From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: 'Stephane Gasparini' <stephane.gasparini@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 'Mel Gorman' <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
'Rafael Wysocki' <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@kernel.org>,
'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org>,
'Matt Fleming' <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
'Mike Galbraith' <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
'Linux-PM' <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
'LKML' <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
'Srinivas Pandruvada' <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness is scaled
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:51:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601d17005$e6369820$b2a3c860$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9E20D36B-1323-41AA-969F-3D2DD5021701@linux.intel.com>
Hi Steph,
On 2016.02.24 08:20 Stephane Gasparini wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> wrote:
>>> On 2016.02.19 03:12 Stephane Gasparini wrote:
>>>
>>> The issue you are reporting looks like one we improved on android by using
>>> the average pstate instead of using the last requested pstate
>>>
>>> We know that this is improving the ffmpeg encoding performance when using the
>>> load algorithm.
>>>
>>> see patch attached
>>>
>>> This patch is only applied on get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load however you can give
>>> it a try on get_target_pstate_use_performance
>>
>> Yes, that type of patch works on the load based approach.
>
> I’m not talking about using average p-state in the scaled_busy computation.
> I’m talking adding the output of the PID (the number of pstate to ad or subtract)
> to the average pstate rather than adding this to the current p-sate.
For the situation we are dealing with here, that would actually make it worse,
wouldn't it?
Let's work through a real very low load example from the Mel V2 patch where
the target pstate is increased whereas it should have been decreased:
Mel patch version 2 (12X hold off added to rjw 3 patch v10 set added to kernel 4.5-rc4):
CPU: 3
Core busy: 105
Scaled busy: 143
Old pstate: 25
New pstate: 34
mperf: 52039
aperf: 55097
tsc: 335265689
freq: 3599750 KHz
Load: 0.02%
Duration (mS): 98.293
New pstate = old pstate + (scaled_busy-setpoint) * p_gain
= 25 + (143 - 97) * 0.2
= 34 (as above)
Ave pstate = max_pstate * aperf / mperf
= 34 * 55097 / 52039
= 36
Steph average pstate method added to the above:
New pstate = ave pstate + (scaled_busy-setpoint) * p_gain
= 36 + (143 - 97) * 0.2
= 45 (before clamping)
Now, just for completeness show the no Mel patch math:
Scaled busy = Core busy * max_pstate / old pstate * sample time / duration
= 105 * 34 / 25 * 10 / 98.293
= 14.53
New pstate = old pstate + (scaled_busy-setpoint) * p_gain
= 25 + (14.53 - 97) * .2
= 8.5
= 16 clamped minimum
Regardless, I coded the average pstate method and observe little
difference between it and the Mel V2 patch with limited testing.
... Doug
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-18 11:11 [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness is scaled Mel Gorman
2016-02-18 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18 21:09 ` Doug Smythies
2016-02-19 10:49 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 14:04 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-18 23:29 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2016-02-18 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19 11:11 ` Stephane Gasparini
2016-02-19 16:38 ` Doug Smythies
2016-02-24 16:19 ` Stephane Gasparini
2016-02-25 19:51 ` Doug Smythies [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002601d17005$e6369820$b2a3c860$@net' \
--to=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stephane.gasparini@linux.intel.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).