RE: [PATCH 0/5] cpufreq: sysfs cleanup

["Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>]

On 2105.10.11 10:21 Viresh Kumar wrote:

>Rafael,
>
> This is in response to the other thread where you and Saravana were
>discussing this. It doesn't allow updating policy for offline CPUs yet,
> but does cleanup the sysfs stuff.
>
> This is untested by me as I didn't had access to the hardware to test
> this week. But this is tested by Fengguang's build bot for some time
> now.
>
> Will be good if one of you can test this out.
>
> Viresh Kumar (5):
>  cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask
>  cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq at boot time
>  cpufreq: remove cpufreq_sysfs_{create|remove}_file()
>  cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories
>  cpufreq: Drop redundant check for inactive policies
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c          | 95 +++++---------------------------------
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 20 ++------
> include/linux/cpufreq.h            |  5 --
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
> -- 
> 2.4.0

For my part of it, this patch set fixes the user space regression
that was introduced into the pm-utils with kernel 4.2.
If it ends up merged, I'll go back and cancel the bug reports
I submitted.

References (mainly for myself):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/1493156
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91914